Karam Chand Thapar and Bros. (Coal Sales) Limited Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.

Decided On : Jul-21-1976

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: the Companies Act, the U.P. Act, the Central Act, Section 22, Section 9(1, the Central Act, the Central Act, the Central Act, Section 2(c, Section 14, Section 14, Section 3, Section 6, Section 6, Section 8, Section 7, Section 8, Section 7, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, Section 3, Section 6, Section 8, Section 9(1, Section 15, the U.P. Act, Section 22, Section 9(1, the Central Act, the Central Act, Section 9(1, the Central Act, Section 22, the U.P. Act, Section 9(1, the Central Act, Section 14, the Central Act, Section 22, the U.P. Act, Section 22, the U.P. Act, Section 9, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8(3, Section 8(3, Section 8, Section 8, the Central Act, Section 9(1, Section 6(2, Section 8(4)(a, Section 6(2, Section 8(4)(a, Section 8(1, Section 7(3, Section 8(1, Section 7, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, the Amendment Act, Section 9(1, Section 9(1, Section 9(1, Section 8(4)(a, Section 22, the U.P. Act, Section 22, the U.P. Act, Section 9(1, Section 9(1, Section 9(1, Section 9(1).10, Section 22(1, Section 22, Section 18, Section 18, the Indian Forest Act, Section 17, the Forest Act, Section 10-A', Section 22, Section 9

PERSON: A.C. Gupta, Gorakhpur, Lucknow, Levy, Singhal, Nariman, and(3, declared goods.6, Nariman, Nariman, Nariman, Chandra Rai Singh, Anr, Madan Lal v. State

NORP: J.1, Rules

CARDINAL: 928, six, 929, two, two, two, 15, six, 929, 929, two, two, 5,59,172/32p, 5,59,172/32p, two, one, one, one, 1, 2, 1, 3, two, 3, 1, 3, one, 5(1, 3, 2, 1, 1, 3, 4, 1, 4, 4, 9(1, 9, 1, 2, one, 2, 4, more than one, 22, 1, one, 5,59,172/32, 1, 2, 1, two, 3, 2, 3, 4, 1, 4, 1, 3, 3, 3, 1, 4, 1, 9(1, 3, 1, 3, 1, 3, one, 1962]1SCR676, 3, 779

DATE: 1975, 1975, 1948, 1956, 1966-67, 1969-70, the assessment year 1966-67, quarterly, 1957, three years, the year 1965-66, 1973, March 27, 1971, March 21, 1974, March 25, 1974, March 26, 1974, March 27, 1971, March 26, 1974, March 31, 1974, March 26, 1974, 8 of 1963, April 1, 1963, April 1, 1963, 8 of 1963, April 1, 1963, 1957, 8 of 1963, March 27, 1971, 1966-67, March 27, 1971, the assessment year 1965-66, March 27, 1971, March 27, 1971, an earlier year, the year 1966-67, the year, March 22, 1974, March 27, 1971, three years, March 25, 1974, March 26, 1974, March 31, 1974, March 31, 1974, three years, 1894, 1927, 1975, thirty days, three years

ORG: M/s. Karam Chand, Thapar and Brothers, Company, the Company at Allahabad, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Sales Tax Officer, Uttar Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Company, Calcutta, Company, Company, the Allahabad High Court, the High Court, Company, Company, Civil Appeal 928, the State of Uttar Pradesh, Central, Company, Uttar Pradesh, the applicability of Section 9(1, the High Court, Civil Appeal 928, Company, Civil Appeal 928, Company, and(b, Uttar Pradesh, Company, the State of Uttar Pradesh, Inter-State, State, State, the Central Sales Tax (Registration and Turnover) Rules, Inter-State, State, State, the Government of India, State, State, State, State, State, Uttar Pradesh, Company, the High Court, State, the High Court, Uttar Pradesh, Company, Company, the Central Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, State, State, the Central Sales Tax (Registration and Turnover) Rules, Company, the State of Uttar Pradesh, Company, Company, Sales Tax, U.P., State, the Sales Tax Officer, Moradabad, Judgment, the High Court, State, the High Court, the High Court, The Judgment of the High Court, Company, Sales Tax, the Sales Tax, Court, Court, U.P., Company, the High Court

GPE: Moradabad, Kanpur, Varanasi, West Bengal, Bihar, l)(b, l)(b, l)(b, Bihar, West Bengal

ORDINAL: second, first, first, second, first

MONEY: three per cent, ten per cent, three per cent

PRODUCT: Co.

WORK_OF_ART: State and Ors, a Judgment of the Allahabad High Court

TIME: the same Amendment Act