State, Through Special Cell, New Delhi Vs. Navjot Sandhu @ Afshan Guru and ors.

Decided On : May-09-2003

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Section 34, Section 34, Section 34, Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Section 482, the Criminal Procedure Code, Article 227 of the Constitution ofIndia, Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code, Article 227, Section 482.16, Article 227 of the Constitution ofIndia, Article 227 of theConstitution of India, Section 482, the Criminal Procedure Code, Article 227 of the Constitution of India.19, Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Section 482, the Criminal Procedure Code, Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Section 482, the Criminal Procedure Code, Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 397(2, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 397(2, Section 482, Section 397(2, Section 397(2, Section 482, the Criminal Procedure Code, Article 227 of the Constitution, Article 227, Article 227, Article 227, Article 227 of theConstitution, Section 397(3, Section 482, Section 482, Constitution, Article 226, Constitution and Section 482, Article 226 of theConstitution, Section 482, Article 227the, Article 226, Constitution, Section 482, Article 227 or Section 482 of the Code, Article 226, Article 226, Article 227, Article 227, Article 227,interfere, Article 227, Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226, Article 227 of the Constitution the, Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Section 41, Section 482, Section 482, Section 397(3, Section 482, Section 482, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, Article 227, Article 227, Article 227 of theConstitution the High Court, Constitution, Article 227 of the Constitution, Article 227 of theConstitution of India, Article 227 of the Constitution, Article 227 of the Constitution, Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Article 227, Article 227, Article 227 of theConstitution of India, Article 227, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 482, Section 397, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 34, Section 482, Article 227, Article 227, Section 34, Section 34, Section 34, Article 227 nor, Section 482, Section 34, Section 34, Section 34, Section 482, Section 34

CARDINAL: 11, 1, 2, 1, 3, 4, 3, 378, 5, 13, two, 227, 1968]3SCR692, 1978CriLJ165, 482, 1979CriLJ318, 1998CriLJ1, 226, 227, 227, 22, 1993CriLJ1042, One, 227, 227, 23, 1954]1SCR565, 24, 1, 122, 25, 1958]1SCR1240, 26, 26, 1999]3SCR759, 2001CriLJ165, 42, 2001CriLJ2566, 2001CriLJ4640, 482, 1954]1SCR565, 128, 226, 227, one, two, one, 6, 1995)6SCC576, 2000)9SCC406, 227, disguise'.33, two, two, one

DATE: '11, 11th July, 2002, thirty days, thirty days, the period ofthirty days, 11th July, 2002, 11th July, 2002, '17, '24, 1952, 1985, '20, 31, 11th July, 2002, approximately two weeks, July 2002, 34

PERSON: Respondent Geelani, Shaukat Hussain, Shanti Bhushan, Respondent Geelani, Dhavan, Shanti Bhushan, Limaye, Singh v. Ranbir Singh, Anr, Anr, Haryana, Bhajan Lal, Waryam Singh v. Amarnath, Sukumar Mukherjee, Laxmibai R. Tarta, Nagendra Nath Bora v. Commr, Roy V.D. v. State of, Rambilas, Anr, Ouseph Mathai, M. Abdul Khadir, Waryam Singh v. Amarnath, Nagendra Nath Bora v.Commr, Laxmibai R. Tarte, Ashalata S. Guram, Trimbak GangadharTelang, MohansinghPardeshi, Anr, Respondent Geelani

ORG: POTA, aCriminal Misc, the High Court, POTA, the High Court, Special Court, the High Court, aSpecial Court, the High Court, the Special Court, the High Court, theHigh Court.14, CriminalMisc, the High Court, The High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, State, V.S. Vaghela and Ors, High Court, the State Legislature, Tribunal, the High Court, theHigh Court, Legislature, HighCourt, the High Court, the High Court, Court, theHigh Court, the High Court, theHigh Court, the High Court, the High Court, Pepsi Foods Ltd., Judicial Magistrates, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, State, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, TheCourt, the Calcutta High Court, Dalmia JainAirways Ltd., theHigh Court, Article227, Court, the Court of theJudicial, Court, High Court, theHigh Court, Court, Court, Hills Divisions, Court, Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India Ltd., Grapco Industries Ltd., Ors, the High Court, Courts, Tribunal, the Narcotics Drugs and PsychotropicSubstances Act, Court, the High Court's, the High Court, the High Court, theHigh Court, Ors, Court, Hills Division and Appeals, InBabhutmal Raichand Oswal, the High Court, Court, Chandavarkar, the High Court, The High Court, Ramchandra Ganesh Bihde, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Rent Control Act, State, Court, the High Court, Court, the State Legislature, Tribunal, HighCourt, the High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, HighCourt, Court, the High Court, POTA, Court, allApplications/Petitions, the High Court, The High Court, Respondent Geelani, POTA, the High Court, the High Court, POTA, POTA, theApplication/Petitions, POTA, POTA, SpecialJudge, POTA, theHigh Court, HighCourt, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, POTA, Court, theRespondents, POTA, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, POTA, the High Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court

PRODUCT: AsSection 482 Criminal Procedure Code, SitaRatna Rao v., Section 227

ORDINAL: first, first, second, second, first

NORP: inthese, Code.23, R., Narayan, R.

GPE: India, India, Gujarat, Madhu, Jagir, Krishnan, Morris, L.J., Kerala, Satya, Koyilerian Janakiv, Karnataka v. M. Devendrappa, SatyaNarayanan Sharma's