Rajendrakumar Natvarlal Shah Vs. State of Gujarat and ors. - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: May-10-1988

Court: Supreme Court of India

LAW: Article 32 of the Constitution, Section 3, Section 2(b, Section 3 of the Act, the Bombay Prohibition Act, Section 3(2, Section 3, Article 21 of the Constitution, Article 32, the Bombay Prohibition Act, Article 22(5, Article 22(5, the Preventive Detention Act, Article 22(5, Article 22(5, Section 3(1, Article 22(5, Article 22(5, Constitution, Section 3(2, Section 2(b, Section 3 of the Act, Section 3, Section 3(2

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 1, 4, 77, 2040, two, 303/82, 142, 150/86, 24, two, 2, two, 1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 1975]2SCR832, two-fold, 1, 2, 1979CriLJ469, two, 410/86, 375/86, 444/86, 31st.12, 154, 1974CriLJ883, one, 1975CriLJ429, 1986CriLJ2042, 1982CriLJ150, 2, 1986CriLJ312, one, 1986CriLJ2047, two, one, 303/82, 142, 150/86, 24, two, two, 3, 1, 4, 4, 3(2, 4

ORG: the Gujarat High Court, the District Magistrate, Panchmahals, Godhra, the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, scotch whisky, Vanswada, scotch whisky, Vanswada, the State of Gujarat, the District Magistrate, Panchmahals, Vanswada, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Learned Counsel, the District Magistrate, State, the State Government, Court, Court, Government, Court, Court, Khudiram Das v. State, Court, Narendra Purshotam Umrao v., the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, Court, Court, Court, State, Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, the Directorate of Enforcement, Directorate, a Screening Committee, the Screening Committee, the Screening Committee, Court, the Conservation of Foreign Exchange & Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, Court, the Conservation of Foreign Exchange & Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, Courts, Court, the Delhi High Court, Union of India and Ors, DLT, Union of India, The District Magistrate, the District Magistrate, the State Government, the District Magistrate, Court, Durga Das Basu's, the District Magistrate, the District Magistrate, Court, J., the District Magistrate, Bal Chand Bansal v. Union of India, Ramesh Yadav, Mukharji, The District Magistrate, the District Magistrate, Explanation, reads:(4, The District Magistrate, State, the District Magistrate Presumably, State, the State Government, the State Government, the Advisory Board, The State Government

DATE: 21st November, 1987, 28th May, 1987, 1985, 3832, 1986, 4th January, 1987, 2nd February, 1987, 21st January, 1987, 1949, 28th May, 1987 i.e., five months, the 30th, 20/30th December, 1986, 21st July, 1982, 30th May, 1986, five months, 1949, today, 1974, months, the highest quarter, 1974, 1974, 2.2.1987, 1985, 11.12.1986, 9.3.1987, 16.4.1984, 1986, 4th January, 1987, 21st January, 1987, the same day, 2nd February, 1987, the same day, 28th May, 1987, 30th May, 1987, the 28th, 28th May, 1987, the lapse of five months, 1974CriLJ938, the months, about five months, months, 1964, 21st July, 1982, May, 1986, 21st January, 1987, 2nd February, 1987, 28th May, 1987, 8th June, 1987, the same on 12th June, 1987

GPE: Godhra, the State of Gujarat, the State of Rajasthan, Limdi, the State of Rajasthan, the State of Gujarat, States, Vansawada, Gujarat, Godhra, Counsel, Bhagwati, States, India, Bhasin, Singh v. Union of India, Singh, India, Olia, Bihar, Suraj, Godhra, Gujarat

NORP: Indian, Indian, Gujarat, Indian, Sharma

TIME: the night, the night

LOC: Machan River, Bar.15

PERSON: Ahmed Saiyad, Abdul Majid Kalander, Sadique Ahmed, Durvesh Shaikh, Godhra, B.B. Gujral, Crl, Anwar Esmail Aibani, Crl, M.L. Wadhawan, Crl, Ramesh Lal v. Delhi Administration, Crl, Golam Hussain @ Gama v., Ali Miah v. State, Krishna Iyer, Vijay Narain Singh, Sen, J., Gora v. State, Kumar Singh, Shah v. State, District Magistrate, Etah

WORK_OF_ART: Criminal Case No. 154/86, 3 SCC 14, Criminal Case No

PRODUCT: Act.4, Hemlata

FAC: Sabarmati Central Prison

ORDINAL: first, second, 8th, 30th, first