Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Rajanna Vs. Union of India
Decided On : Apr-19-1995
Court : Supreme Court of India
ORG: Verma, the Cabinet Secretariat, the Central Government, the Special Protection Group, SPG, SPG, SPG, SPG, the Special Protection Group, the Cabinet Secretariat, SPG, SPG, SA, Government, SA, the Central Administrative Tribunal, Tribunal, SPG, Additional Solicitor General, the Special Protection Group, SPG, SPG, SPG, SPG, SPG, SPG, SPG, SPG, SPG, SPG, SPG, SPG, SPG, SPG, Court, the Workmen's Compensation Act.10, Saurashtra Salt Manufacturing Co., SPG, SPG, SPG, the South Block, Maokinnon Mackenzie & Co. Pvt. Ltd., The House of Lords, Yorkshire Railway Co., Highley, A.C. 352, Laws of England, SPG, the South Block, SPG
NORP: J.1
CARDINAL: 50,000, 13.6.1986, 50,000, Fifty thousand, 3., one, 25%.4, 50,000, 50,000, 24.1.1990, 872, one, 33, One, only one, 369, 374)(emphasis, 10,000
DATE: 20.6.1986, 17.9.1985, 20.6.1986, the staff quarters, 13.6.1986, 23 July, 92, 1992, 1985, 13.6.1986, 1958)IILLJ249SC, 1970)ILLJ16SC, 1917
FAC: the South Block
GPE: New Delhi, New Delhi - 110, O.A., New Delhi, India, Lancashire, Halsbury
QUANTITY: 9.00 am
TIME: 5.30 p.m., about 8.20 a.m., 9.00 a.m., the duty hours
LOC: the South Block, South Block, the South Block
PERCENT: 50%
PERSON: Safdurjung Lane, Shri Rajanna, Admn.)ToShri Rajanna, Principal Bench, Annex, Ibrahim Mahommed
WORK_OF_ART: SPG5, Fourth Edition
EVENT: the Workmen's Compensation Act, the Workmen's Compensation Act