Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Jyothi TIn and Allied Industries Vs. Income-tax Officer

Decided On : Nov-30-1992

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

LAW: Section 20, Section 29, Section 44, Section 44, Section 29, Section 29, Section 2(2, Section 44, Section 2(2, Section 29, Section 29, Section 29.They, Section 29, Section 29, Section 29, the IIT Act, Section 29, Section 29, Section 18A(6, Section 18A(6, Section 23(3, Section 34(3, Notice under Section 29, Section 23(1, Section 29, Section 29, Section 273(b, Notice under Section 221(1, Section 140(cc, Section 2(47, Section 140(cc, the IT Rules, Rule 45, Section 140, Section 140(cc, Section 140(cc, Section 246, Section 247, Section 247, Section 11, the Companies Act, Section 221, Section 221(1, Section 44

CARDINAL: 1, 22, three, two, two, 67, 14,310, 1,854, 27,737, 8,554, 25,000, 4,675, 29-3-1973, 20,000, 3,204, one, two, 48, one, 813, 814, 581, 113, 380, 12,573.03, One, more than one, 64, 364, 23(3, 26, 1954, 25, 4, 20, 7, 9, 19-2-1971, 11, 13 to 15, 25, 17, 29, 19, 16-11-1983, 20, 6-12-1971, two, 19-2-1971, 17, 25, 19-4-1972, 29, 3, 3, 5, 1, 36, 36, 45, 45(2)(cc, 18-5-1989, 36, 47(1, 2, 253, 81 to 84, two, 87, 154, more than 20, 2, more than 20, less than 20, 20, 3, 16-11-1983, 20, two, two, 20-1-1971, 5, 5, 3 and 4, 1, 2, 20, 19, 30-4-1945, 30-4-1946, 30-4-1945, 83, 1, 30-4-1946, 1, 30-4-1945, 120, 22, 20

DATE: years 1966-67, 1967-68, 1970-71, 1971-72, all these years, these four years, 14 to 17 years, 16-12-1970 Rs, 25-03-1972, 1957, about l0 1/2 months, 1922, 1961, 1963, about 4 years, 1922, 1922, 1922, 1922, 1922, four years, 1922, 1978, 1922, four years, the assessment year, 1922, year 1956-57, 1922, 20-8-1960, 11-12-1964, 14-12-1964, 4 years, 1922, 1922, 4 years, 4 years, 79, four years, the assessment year, 4525, year 1966-67, year 1966-67, year 1967-68, 1970-71, 1971-72, 1967-68, 25-10-1971, 1966-67, 17-12-1971, year 1966-67, 1966-67, 1970-71, 1971, 1970-71, year 1971-72, years 1967-68, 1966-67, 1970-71, 1971-72, year 1966-67, 1970-71, 1971-72, year 1967-68, year 1966-67, 1970-71, 1971-72, year 1967-68, year 1967-68, years, each of these years, Section 140(cc, 1962, 35, 5-11, 1973, 25-11-1983, 5-11-1983, 1951, 1st May, July, 1946, the year 1-5-1945, the year, 1979, years 1961-62, 1962-63, 1963-64, 1964-65, 1965-66, 1949, 1964-65, 1965-66, 1961-62, 1962-63, 1963-64, 1962-63, 1963-64, two assessment years 1962-63, 1963-64

PRODUCT: B-Range, M/s. Jyothi Tin &amp, 362

ORG: Hyderabad, Allied Industries, Asst, order1966, Photostat, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, the A.P. General Sales-tax Act, A.P. High Court's, Departmental Representative, the Mysore High Court, ITO, the Mysore High Court, Mysore High Court, Lordships, Lordships, Legislature, the Patna High Court, Legislature, the Mysore High Court, Legislature, the Calcutta High Court, CIT, Karnani Industrial Bank Ltd., the Calcutta High Court, the Calcutta High Court, The Calcutta High Court, the Calcutta High Court, Court, Tribunal, CIT, the Mysore High Court, Departmental Representative, A.P. High Court's, Departmental Representative, Departmental Representative, ITO, C-Ward, Hyderabad, the Departmental Representative, Department, Poonamchand Toshniwal, Poonamchand Toshniwal, Departmental, Departmental Representative, Appellate, the Commissioner (Appeals, Departmental Representative, the Managing Partner, the Managing Partner, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Allied Industries, Departmental Representative, Departmental Representative, the Commissioner (Appeals, Assessing, Poonamchand Toshniwal, Tribunal, CIT, Departmental Representative, Departmental Representative, the Calcutta High Court, CEPT, the Calcutta High Court, the Calcutta High Court, Departmental Representative, Calcutta High Court, CIT v. Southern Bank Ltd., ITR, Southern Bank Limited, The Southern Bank Ltd., U.I. Bank Limited, the assessee Bank (Southern Bank Ltd., U.I. Bank, the Southern Bank Ltd., the Appellate Asstt, Southern Bank Limited, G.I. Bank Limited, G.I. Bank Limited, the Calcutta High Court, the Southern Bank Ltd., the United Industrial Bank Ltd., the United Bank Limited, the Southern Bank Liniited, The Calcutta High Court, Tribunal, the Southern Bank Ltd., the United Industrial Bank Ltd., Southern Bank Ltd., ITO, Bank Ltd., the Calcutta High Court's, Southern Bank Ltd. 's, Departmental Representative, Departmental Representative, Calcutta High Court's, Southern Bank Ltd. 's

PERSON: Suraj Prakash, Budhi Prakash, Shri Poonamchand Toshniwal, N. Subba Rao v., Sri Srinivasan, Narayan Bhanja Deo, Narayan Bhanja Deo, Kanika, N. Subba Rao's, Sampath Iyengar's ', Shri Poonamchand Toshniwal, Shri Poonamchand Toshniwal, merits.4, Poonamchand Toshniwal, Rule 45(2)(cc, Shri Poonamchand Toshniwal, Shri Y. Ratnakar, Rule 45(2, Shri Poonamchand, Shri Poonamchand Toshniwal, Nos, Suraj Prakash, Budhi Prakash, Shri Poonamchand Toshniwal, Shri Poonamchand Toshniwal, Shri Poonamchand Toshniwal, Shri Budhi Prakash, Shri Suraj Prakash, Poonamchand Toshniwal, Shri Poonamchand Toshniwal, Shri Poonamchand Toshniwal, Ramnath Bajoria, Shri Poonamchand Toshniwal, Shri Poonamchand Toshniwal, Shri Poonamchand Toshniwal, Ramnath Bajoria's

GPE: assessee, Rajendra, Rajendra, Badri, Bajoria, Rm, P.R., Viswanathan, Badri, Bajoria, Bajoria, Bajoria, Bajoria, Bajoria, the United Indu, Ramnath Bajoria's

ORDINAL: second, second, second, second, second, third, firstly

NORP: Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian

TIME: 6-12-1971.So, 30-1-1965

QUANTITY: 9-4-1972

WORK_OF_ART: Shri Poonamcharid Toshniwal

FAC: Aruppukottai Chandra Bus Lines

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //