Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Umesh Verma Vs. Jai Devi Bhandari and anr.
Decided On : May-14-1998
Court : Supreme Court of India
LAW: Section 14C, Section 14C, Section 14C, Section 14(1)(e, Section 14(1)(e, Section 25B(1, Section 14B, Section 25B. Sub-section, Section 25B, Section 14, Section 14A.'7, Section 14(1)(e, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 25B, Section 14-A, Section 14(1)(e, Section 14-B., Section 14-B, Section 25-B, Section 25-B, Section 14B
GPE: ORDERNanavati
NORP: J.1
ORG: the Delhi High Court, Civil Revision Application, The High Court, Central Government, the Court of the Rent Controller, the Delhi Rent Control Act, Central Government, the High Court, The High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Central Government, Central Government, Delhi Administration, the Central Government, the Delhi Administration, the Delhi Rent Control (Amendment) Act, Controller, the Central Government, the Delhi Administration, Controller, Court, Singh Kalra v. Union of India, Court, Court, Court, Sections 14-B, Sections 14-B to Section 14-D, Sections 14-B, the Central Government, Delhi Administration, the Central Government, the Delhi Administration, Court, the High Court, the High Court
CARDINAL: 379, 30.11.96, 14(l)(e, 14C, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, one, One, 25B, 19S8, 1, 2, more than one, only one, 14C, 2, 5, 5, 1, 14C, 1991]1SCR364, 14B, 5, 5, 14, 14, 14, 5, 14-D., 14, two, 14C, 2, two, 379
DATE: 1997, 1958, December 1, 1975, 25C, one year, one year, 1988, less than one year, one year, 14D, Sections 14B, 14D, less than one year, 1997, a period of, two months, today
PERSON: Delhi Under Sections, Jai Devi, Kumar, Salman Khurshid, Controller
ORDINAL: first, second, third, first, second
PRODUCT: Respondent, landlord.10
EVENT: Sections 14B, Sections 14B
MONEY: 25B(5
WORK_OF_ART: Surjit Singh Kalra 's