Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

The Deputy Commissioner of Agricultural Income Tax and Sales Tax Central Zone, Ernakulam Vs. Kotak and Co., Bombay, Etc. Etc.

Decided On : Apr-03-1973

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 5(2, Article 286 of the Constitution, Section 5(2, Sales Tax Act

PERSON: K.S. Hegde, Sayed Mohammed, Court, Sayed Mohammed, Khosla, Khosla, Khosla, Sayed Mohammed, Bangalore, Madras, Court, Khosla

NORP: J.1, Egyptian

ORG: Appeals, Appellate, the Sales Tax Tribunal, the Central Sales Tax Act, The High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, Government, the Appellate Tribunal, the Sales Tax, the American Suppliers, C.I.F. Cochin, C.I.F., Bank, the Agent Bank, Cochin, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Counsel for, the High Court, Government, Customs, goods.5, Court, K.G. Khosla & Co., Commr, Reliance, Court, Coffee Board, The Coffee Board, Court, the Coffee Board's

DATE: 1956, 1956

CARDINAL: One, 37, one, 20-3-1964, 1966]3SCR352, 1966]3SCR352, two, 1970]3SCR147, one, 1966]3SCR352, 1970]3SCR147, four, four, One

ORDINAL: Secondly

LOC: South India

GPE: Egypt, Sudan, America, New York, India, India, Belgium, India, India, India

MONEY: 1966]3SCR352 .8

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //