Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Prakash Amichand Shah Vs. State of Gujarat
Decided On : Jul-24-1981
Court : Supreme Court of India
LAW: Section 22, Section 34, Section 32(1, Constitution, Section 32(1, Section 32(1, Section 2 of the Act, Section 2(2, Section 3, Section 2, the Gujarat Municipalities Act, Chapter III, Section 18, Section 21 to Section 30, Section 22, Section 25, Section 26, Section 27, Section 31 to Section 43, Section 31(1, Section 32(1, Chapter VI Section, Section 64 to Section 78, Section 64(I, Section 64, Section 65, Section 66, Section 67, Section 67, Section 69, Section 24, Section 71, Section 71, Section 66, Section 87, Section 53, Article 31(2, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 4(1, the Town Planning Act, Section 32(1, Section 64, Section 65, Section 66, Section 67, Section 68, Section 69, Section 32(1, Section 33, Section 32, Section 34, Section 32(1, Section 32(1, Section 65, Section 65, Section 25, Rule 17, Section 69, Section 69, Section 23(1, Section 3 of the Land Acquisition Act, Section 23(1, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 32(1, Section 71, Section 32(1)(iii, the Constitution Bench
PERSON: A.C. Gupta, Articles 14, Shirr Chantilly, Nariman, Shantilal Mangalias, M.G. Makwana, Nariman, Shantilal, Shantilal, Shah J., Shantilal Mangaldas, Shah J., Nariman
NORP: J.1, Hindu
DATE: June 26, 1965, 1954, July 4, 1967, May 10, 1968 Government of Gujarat, November 4, 1971, November 4, 1971, 19, 1949, 1973, one month, six months, one month, 33, the day, 33, 1955, 1894
ORG: the Surat Municipal Corporation, the Bombay Town Planning Act, Town Planning Scheme Surat, Umarwada, Karta, the Town Planning Officer, the Town Planning Officer, the Town Planning Officer, the Town Planning Officer, Board of Appeal, the Board of Appeal, The Board of Appeal, the Town Planning Officer, the Board of Appeal, the Gujarat High Court, The Gujarat High Court, the Board of Appeal, The High Court, Court, State, the Board of Appeal, the Board of Appeal, the Board of Appeal, the Town Planning Officer, Court, State, Court, State, Court, the State of Gujarat, the State Government, the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, Chapter IV, the State Government, Clauses, the State Government, the State Government, the Town Planning Officer, the Board of Appeal, the State Government, the State Government, the Town Planning Officer, Sections 32, the Town Planning Officer's, the Town Planning Officer, the State Government, the Town Planning Officer, inter alia, the Town Planning Officer, Court, State, the Town Planning Officer, the Town Planning Officer, Chapter IX, the State Government, The High Court, the Town Planning Officer, the Town Planning Officer, xiv, Clauses (v), the Town Planning Officer, Board of Appeal, the Town Planning Officer, Clauses (v), the Town Planning Officer, the Town Planning Officer's, The Town Planning Officer, the Bombay Town Planning Rules, the Town Planning Officer, the Town Planning Officer, the High Court, the Town Planning Officer
FAC: Surat Borough Municipality, Rustom Cavasjee Cooper v. Union
CARDINAL: 1,37,961, 50, 2.40, 9.50, 31, 1969]3SCR341, 2, 3, 1967]3SCR65, 1968]1SCR641, 652, 1970]3SCR530, 4., 4, 2, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 6, 34, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 349, two, one, 8., 357, 9, 34, 32, 1, 1, 1, 17, 10, 11, 12
GPE: Gujarat, Gujarat, Karnataka v. Shri Ranganatha Reiiv, Untwalia, Shantilal, Clauses, Clauses, Clauses, Clause, Gujarat, Shantilal, Shantilal, Clause
LANGUAGE: Moneklal
WORK_OF_ART: Plan, 'Declaration of Intention to Make a Scheme and Making of a Draft Scheme'