Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Siddeshwari Cotton Mills (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Decided On : Jan-17-1989

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 35-L of the Central Excise, Rule 173-Q., Section 2[f][v, Section 2(f, Section 2(f, Item 19-1, Item 19-1, Section 2[f][v, Section 2(f)(v, Section 2(f)(v, Section 2(f)(v, Section 2(f, Act 5, List 1, Constitution, Section 2(f)(v, List 1, Section 2(f)(v, Section 2(f)(v, Section 2(f)(v

PERSON: M.N. Venkatachaliah, Metres, Schedule, E.A. Driedger, Francis Bennion, Francis Bennion, Hari Shanker

NORP: J.1, Central Excise, Item, dem, dem

DATE: 1944, 1944, between 14.5.1981 and, 19.9.1981, 24.8,1982, 16.3.1984, 1985, 1986, 1985, 1920, 1984

ORG: P] Ltd., Central Government, the Central Excise Rules, Textile, Tribunal, Sri A.K. Ganguly, the First Schedule, The Collector of Central Excise, The Central Board of Excise, Customs, the Appellate-Tribunal, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, The Appellate Tribunal, CET, the Appellate Tribunal, Section 2(f)(v).The Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Court, Empire Industries v. Union of India, Statutory Construction, Statutory Construction, Farwell LJ, Macintyre Bros. & Co., Tribhuban Parkash, Nayyar v. Union of India, Court, U.P.S.E. Board, Tribunal, Learned Counsel, Sri A.K. Ganguly, Counsel for Revenue, the Appellate-Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Court, the Appellate Tribunal

GPE: New Delhi, Sri Soli J. Sorabjee, Sri Sorabjee, Counsel

CARDINAL: 230/77, 231/77, 15.7.1977, 15.7.1977, 1, 1, 19, 15.7.1977, 19, 2,62,767,04, 19-1, 19, 84, 1, 292, 84, 97, 95, 829, 830, 3, 1970]2SCR732, 8, two, 151

QUANTITY: 6,09,848.47 Sq

PRODUCT: Calcutta

EVENT: SC 65

FAC: Sri Ganguly.10

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //