Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Siddeshwari Cotton Mills (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Decided On : Jan-17-1989
Court : Supreme Court of India
LAW: Section 35-L of the Central Excise, Rule 173-Q., Section 2[f][v, Section 2(f, Section 2(f, Item 19-1, Item 19-1, Section 2[f][v, Section 2(f)(v, Section 2(f)(v, Section 2(f)(v, Section 2(f, Act 5, List 1, Constitution, Section 2(f)(v, List 1, Section 2(f)(v, Section 2(f)(v, Section 2(f)(v
PERSON: M.N. Venkatachaliah, Metres, Schedule, E.A. Driedger, Francis Bennion, Francis Bennion, Hari Shanker
NORP: J.1, Central Excise, Item, dem, dem
DATE: 1944, 1944, between 14.5.1981 and, 19.9.1981, 24.8,1982, 16.3.1984, 1985, 1986, 1985, 1920, 1984
ORG: P] Ltd., Central Government, the Central Excise Rules, Textile, Tribunal, Sri A.K. Ganguly, the First Schedule, The Collector of Central Excise, The Central Board of Excise, Customs, the Appellate-Tribunal, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, The Appellate Tribunal, CET, the Appellate Tribunal, Section 2(f)(v).The Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Court, Empire Industries v. Union of India, Statutory Construction, Statutory Construction, Farwell LJ, Macintyre Bros. & Co., Tribhuban Parkash, Nayyar v. Union of India, Court, U.P.S.E. Board, Tribunal, Learned Counsel, Sri A.K. Ganguly, Counsel for Revenue, the Appellate-Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Court, the Appellate Tribunal
GPE: New Delhi, Sri Soli J. Sorabjee, Sri Sorabjee, Counsel
CARDINAL: 230/77, 231/77, 15.7.1977, 15.7.1977, 1, 1, 19, 15.7.1977, 19, 2,62,767,04, 19-1, 19, 84, 1, 292, 84, 97, 95, 829, 830, 3, 1970]2SCR732, 8, two, 151
QUANTITY: 6,09,848.47 Sq
PRODUCT: Calcutta
EVENT: SC 65
FAC: Sri Ganguly.10