T.V. Sundram Iyengar and Sons Vs. the State of Madras

Decided On : Oct-10-1974

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Madras Act 9 of 1939, Constitution, the Constitution Bench

PERSON: H.R. Khanna, J.1, Nos, T. V. Sundram Iyengar & Sons Pvt, Swaminathan, Swaminathan, saloon mofussil, T. V. Sundram, Nos, Bangalore, Controller, Gajendragadkar C.J., Shah J. dissenting, Controller, M.G. Brothers.11, Haji Abdul Majid, Chandra Bhan Gosain, Swaminathan, Shah J., Anr, Menuh Ram, Swaminathan, Nenu Ram's, Bangalore, Swaminathan, Rennie, L.R., Anr, Pothula Subba Rao v., Nos, Nos

CARDINAL: five, 2230, 2231, 290, 291, 2230, 2231, two, five, three, 3, five, three, one, 7, 9,000, 51, 4, 460, 10,171.50, 5, 290, 291, 8), 9,74,460, two, 6, 48, 54, 25, 9, 353, two, two, 16, 364, 16, 518, one, two, five, two, 13, 19, 13, three, two, two, four, 21, 245, 24, 349, 26, 268, 29, 474, two, one, four, 29, three, 167, 10, five, 2231, 290, 291, One

DATE: 2229, 1969, 1970, 2229, 1969, years 1955-56, 1956-57, 1957-58, 1939, 1970, years 1960-61, 1961-62, January 23, 1959, 6 months, 6 months, the year 1960-61, 1967, 34, 1935, 1957, 1957, 1930, 1958, the same day, 1965, 1965, two years, every day, one month, seven days, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1972, 1972, 1875, 18, 2229, 2230, 1969, 1970

ORG: Madurai, the Mysore High Court, Appellate, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, The High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, Sheets & Aluminium Beadings, Tribunal, The High Court, The Store Purchase Committee, the State of Mysore, the Government., M. O. Brothers Automobile Dealers Bellary, the State Government, the Mysore Government Road Transport Department, Mysore Government Road Transport Department, the Mysore Sales Tax Act, the Mysore High Court, The High Court, the High Court, The High Court, The Madras General Sales Tax Act, the Government of India Act, the Mysore Sales Tax Act, Madras v., Gannon Dunkerley & Co., Madras) Ltd., Court, Court, Patnaik, The State of Orissa, McKenzies Ltd., The State of Maharashtra (, Patnaik and Company, the State of Orissa, inter alia, Hidayatullab, Sikri, the State of Orissa, Government, the Body Builder, Controller, Controller, Court, Patnaik and Company, the High Court, T.V. Sundram Iyengar & Sons, the Allahabad High Court, Court, Patnaik and Company, Patnaik, the Mysore High Court, Government, Patnaik, the High Court, Patnaik and Company, Patnaik, the High Court, The High Court, The State of Orissa, Court, The State of Gujarat, Kailash Engineering Co., the Western Railway Administration, Railway, Kailash Engineering Co., Kailash Engineering Co., Kailash Engineering Co., Patnaik and Company, Court, Kailath Engineering Co., Court, Patnaik and Company, Kailash Engineering Co., Madras v. Richardson & Cruddas Ltd., Ryasthan, Man Industrial Corporation Ltd., State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors, Associated Hotels of India Ltd., Richardson & Cruddas Ltd., Court, Man Industrial Corporation Ltd., Associated Hotels of India Ltd., Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd., Manufacture, the Railway Board, Benjamin on Sales, Navigation Co., Patnaik and Company, Navigation Co., the Allahabad High Court, Bajoria Halwasiya Service, Andhra Pradesh High Court, The State of A.P., the High Court

FAC: cost.(11, the Sale of Goods Act, Railway, Railway, Railway, Railway, Railway

PERCENT: 90%, 10%

GPE: Halsbury, S.T.C.

EVENT: List II

MONEY: 50 per cent, 90 per cent

ORDINAL: first

LOC: the Body Builder

NORP: Anglo, Anglo