Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Lakhanpal National Limited Vs. M.R.T.P. Commission and anr.

Decided On : May-02-1989

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 36-D(1, Section 36-B of the Act, Section 36-A., Section 36-B, Section 36-A, Section 36, Section 36-A, Chapter V of the Act, Section 36-A, Section 36-A of the Act

PERSON: Lalit Mohan Sharma

NORP: J.1, Indian, Technics

ORG: the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, the Unfair Trade Practices Enquiry No, Commission, Company, Company, M/S Mitsushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd., National Panasonic of Japan, National Panasonic of Japan, National Panasonic, National Panasonic, Company, Company, M/s. Mitsushita Electric Industrial Ltd., Mitsushita Ltd., the Ministry of Industry, Government of India, the Mitsushita Ltd., Panasonic, the Japanese Company, Commission, Mitsushita Ltd., National Panasonic of Japan, Clauses, Unfair, Panasonic, the Mitsushita Ltd., Company, Commission, the National & Panasonic Batteries, Panasonic and National, National, Panasonic, National, Panasonic, Panasonic, Company, Commission, Panasonic, the Mitsushita Ltd., Committee, Malsbury, The Mitsushita Ltd., Panasonic, Mitsushita Ltd., Panasonic, Panasonic, Mitsushita Ltd., Commission, the Japanese Company, Commission

DATE: 1969, November 13, 1987, today, daily, 1044, arguments.11

CARDINAL: 76, 198, 36, one, 36, 36, 1984.7, 104, 110, 10, one

LOC: Novino, Novino, Novino, Novino Battery, Novino Battery, Novino

GPE: Japan, Japan, Clauses, Japan, Novino Batteries, India

WORK_OF_ART: Laws of England (Fourth Edition

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //