Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Lakhanpal National Limited Vs. M.R.T.P. Commission and anr.
Decided On : May-02-1989
Court : Supreme Court of India
LAW: Section 36-D(1, Section 36-B of the Act, Section 36-A., Section 36-B, Section 36-A, Section 36, Section 36-A, Chapter V of the Act, Section 36-A, Section 36-A of the Act
PERSON: Lalit Mohan Sharma
NORP: J.1, Indian, Technics
ORG: the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, the Unfair Trade Practices Enquiry No, Commission, Company, Company, M/S Mitsushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd., National Panasonic of Japan, National Panasonic of Japan, National Panasonic, National Panasonic, Company, Company, M/s. Mitsushita Electric Industrial Ltd., Mitsushita Ltd., the Ministry of Industry, Government of India, the Mitsushita Ltd., Panasonic, the Japanese Company, Commission, Mitsushita Ltd., National Panasonic of Japan, Clauses, Unfair, Panasonic, the Mitsushita Ltd., Company, Commission, the National & Panasonic Batteries, Panasonic and National, National, Panasonic, National, Panasonic, Panasonic, Company, Commission, Panasonic, the Mitsushita Ltd., Committee, Malsbury, The Mitsushita Ltd., Panasonic, Mitsushita Ltd., Panasonic, Panasonic, Mitsushita Ltd., Commission, the Japanese Company, Commission
DATE: 1969, November 13, 1987, today, daily, 1044, arguments.11
CARDINAL: 76, 198, 36, one, 36, 36, 1984.7, 104, 110, 10, one
LOC: Novino, Novino, Novino, Novino Battery, Novino Battery, Novino
GPE: Japan, Japan, Clauses, Japan, Novino Batteries, India
WORK_OF_ART: Laws of England (Fourth Edition