Nawab Shaqafath Ali Khan and ors. Vs. Nawab Imdad Jah Bahadur and ors.

Decided On : Mar-05-2009

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 3 of the 1950 Act, Sections 56, the Indian Trusts Act, Article 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Validation Amendment Act, Section 9, Section 56, the Trusts Act, Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the Indian Trusts Act, Section 34, the Indian Trusts Act, Section 6, the Indian Trusts Act, Article 139A of the Constitution of India, Article 136 of the Constitution of India, Section 105 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 115, Section 115 of the Code, Section 115 of the Code, Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 47 of the Act, Section 115, Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 thereof.54, Article 136 of the Constitution of India, Sections 56, the Indian Trusts Act, Article 142 of the Constitution of India

ORG: S.B. Sinha, H.E.H., Nizam, Jewellary Trust', jewellary and antique pieces.2, Nizam, Nizam, Nizam, Kazim Jah, Remaining Daughters Fund', Trust, Trust, the Trust Deed, Trustees, the Trust Property, Trust Property, Trust, H.E.H., Nizam, Shahbada Nawab Basalat Jha Bahadur, the Principal Fund, the Remaining Sons' Fund, the Remaining Sons' Fund, Trustees, the Remaining Sons' Fund, Remaining Sons Fund, the Remaining Sons' Fund, the Remaining Sons' Fund, the Remaining Sons' Fund, the Remaining Sons' Fund, the Remaining Sons' Fund, Clause 10 of the Trust Deed, the Remaining Daughters' Fund, Beneficiaries, the Remaining Sons' Fund, the Remaining Sons' Fund, State, Nizam, the Presidential Assent, the Court of Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, City Civil Court, Original Petition No, Trustees, Trust, Trust Funds, Trustees, Principal Fund, Trustees, the Trust Deed in Clause 11, the High Court, The High Court, O.P. No, O.P. No, maintainable.27, the High Court, Trust, Nizam, the Principal Civil Court, Special Leave Petition Nos, Court, the High Court, C.A. Nos, the High Court, C.A. No, Court, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, City Civil Court, CCA, CMP No, the High Court, the City Civil Court, Court, CCA, the High Court, The High Court, Reliance, C.V. Rajendran, Reliance, Ors, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, the High Court, Reliance, Chandi Prasad Chokhani, the High Court, High Court, the High Court, City Civil Court.(xiii, the City Civil Court, the High Court, Trial Judges, the High Court, Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, The High Court, the High Court, maintained.46, C.V. Rajendran, Taluk Land Board, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, D.L.F. Housing and Construction Company (P.) Ltd., the High Court, Court, the High Court, The High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Reliance, the High Court, party.52, Ajantha Transports, Combatore, Pulampatti, Court, the High Court, Court, Court, the District Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court

PERSON: J.INTRODUCTION1, Dullan Pasha Begum Saheba, Trustees, Shabzadi Begum, Begum, Muazzam Jah, Settlor, Settlor, Beneficiary, Beneficiary, Beneficiary, Beneficiary, Settlor, Settlor, Settlor, Settlor, Settlor, Settlor, Settlor, Schedule, Settlor, Settlor, Settlor, Settlor, Settlor, noted:(a, C.A. Nos, notice.35, P.P. Rao, Nos, Anr, N.M., Ouseph Mathai, M. Abdul Khadir, Taherakhatoon, Salambin Mohammad, Dushyant A. Dave, Rajendra Choudhary, Order XIV, Anr, so.41, Order XIV, Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, Chandi Prasad Chokhani, jurisdiction.50, Rao, Sarup Singh, Rao, Ouseph Mathai, Articles 226, Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai, Rao

CARDINAL: 29.3.1951, Two, two, two, thirteen, seventeen, 9 to 11, 9, 10, 29.03.1951, sixteen, Four, Four, 6, One, One, Three, II, 9, three, 10.8, 9, three, II, 126, One hundred twenty six, 126, II, II, two, thirteen, 14, two, one, II, 14, 10, seven, 14, 14, two, one, II, 7, II, 9, 7, 13, 1 to 5, 12, 846, 17, 2, 15, 1, 14, 3, 17, 173, 61, 9, 10 and 11, 1, 253, 383, 2, 3, 8 to 10, Forty, 540, three, 1, 1, two, 21.07.1999.FINDINGS21, 9, 10, 2, one, 126, II, 17, 22, 7, 14, II, 9, 10, 540/1998...25, 540, 1998.PROCEEDINGS, 21.07.1999, 1, 2, 846, 2, 847, two, two, 173, 253, two, two, two, two, two, 61, 27.03.2000, 846, 848, 849, 2001.30, Two, 850, 2001.SUBSEQUENT, 540, 3.04.2000, 114, 3.04.2000, 10.04.2000, 21.01.2000, 114, 21.07.1999, 3.04.2000, 348, 540, 2002]SUPP2SCR390, 21.07.1999, 1961]43ITR498(SC, three, 9(e, 10(e, one, 61, 2000]245ITR360(SC, two, 21.07.1999, 3.04.2000.42, 21.07.1999, 3.04.2000, two, 1999)5SCC590, one, 1970]2SCR368, 1975]2SCR166, one, 227, 55, 61, 226, 227, 21.07.1999

ORDINAL: third, second, third, first, second, second, third, third, second, first, third, second, second, third, second, 6th, second, second, third

NORP: Jewellery

EVENT: Clause 5, Parts II

GPE: Dulhan, clause.10, O.S., O.S., O.S., O.P., O.S., Kunhi, Kerala, New Delhi, India, Taherakhatoon

WORK_OF_ART: the Remaining Sons' Fund', Kunhayammed and Ors

PRODUCT: II & III

DATE: 1950, 22.06.1950, 1950, the year 1951, 7, 8, 11, 2001, 10, 13, 4, 5, 7, 12, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16, 1998, 1882, 1998, the same year, 1998, two weeks, 1998, 4 and, 14, 383/1998, 2001, 2001, 1998, 1998, 4372-4373, 2000, two weeks, 2001, 1998, fund.32, 11230 of 2000, 1999, 21.07.1999, the period 1952 to 1958, 1958, 21.07.1999, 21.07.1999, 21.07.1999

MONEY: law,(2

FAC: Sections 56

LOC: Additional District, Additional District