Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

T.S. Krishna Vs. C.i.T., Madras

Decided On : Oct-03-1972

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 256(1, Section 10(2)(xv, Section 10(2)(xv, Section 40, Section 58, Section 58, Section 40, the Amending Act, Section 40, Section 58 of the Act, Section 57, Section 57, the Amendment Act :(2, Section 40, Section 58, Section 40, Section 40, Section 40, Section 58, Section 5 of the Amendment Act, Section 40, Section 58, Section 2, the Amending Act, Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, Section 7, Section 40, Section 7, Section 58, Section 57 of the Act, Section 10(2)(xv

PERSON: P. Jaganmohan Reddy, J.1, C.I.T. Kerala, Bench, Act.5

DATE: 1961, 1922, 1972]84ITR735(SC, July 15, 1972, 1972, 1961, years, year 1962-63, 58, 1961, 1957, 1922, the assessment year, the 1st day of April, 1957 or, the 15th day of July, 1972, 1972, that year, that particular year, years, 1962-63, 1922, the 1st day of April 1957, 58, 1957, 1922

PRODUCT: the 'Act', Schedule

ORG: Tribunal, Travancore Titanium Products, Court, Court, Court, Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd., C.I.T., the Travancore Titanium Products, Excess Profits, the Supreme Court, Court, the Indian Aluminium Co., Explanation, Court, Indian Aluminium Company, Reliance, Explanation, the High Court, the High Court

NORP: Indian, Indian, Hindu, Indian

WORK_OF_ART: Travancore Titanium

CARDINAL: 1A, 1A, 30, 39, 1, 1A, 1A, two, two

LOC: Indian Aluminium

GPE: Sections, India, India, Sections, India, India, India, India, IA

ORDINAL: first, first

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //