Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Indian and Eastern Newspaper Society, New Delhi Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi
Decided On : Aug-31-1979
Court : Supreme Court of India
LAW: the Income Tax Act, the Indian Companies Act, the Income Tax Act, Section 147, Section 139, the Income Tax Act, Section 16 of the Comptroller and Auditor General's-(Duties, Section 16 of the Comptroller and Auditor General's, The Income Tax Act, Section 16 of the Comptroller and AuditorrGeneral's, the Income Tax Act 1961.12, Section 10 of the Act, Section 9, Section 23(2, the Income Tax Act, Section 59, the Estate Duty Act, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act
ORG: R.S. Pathak, the Income Tax Department, the High Courts, Eastern Newspaper Society, The Income Tax Department, Appellate, the Income Tax Officer, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, The Gujarat High Court, Group Circle, Chand Kanwarji Alwar, the Delhi High Court, Tribunal, the High Courts, Tribunal, the Internal Audit party, the Gujarat High Court, Court, Income Tax Officer, Court, point.5, the Income Tax Officer, Sections 148, Court, the Indian Income Tax Act, Court, the Income-Tax Act, the Income Tax Department, Receipt Audit.(Internal Audit Manual, Vol, II P., Powers, Conditions of Services, Union, the Consolidated Fund of India, State, a Legislative Assembly, Circular, Conditions of Service, the Audit Department, the Internal Audit, the Income Tax Department, the Commissioners of Income Tax, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Income Tax Department, Auditor-General, the Income Tax Department, Conditions of Service, the Income Tax Department, the Income Tax Officer, Sections 9 and 10, Reliance, Co., Court, the Indian Income Tax Act, Court, Income Tax, Income Tax v. Raman and Company, Bankipur Club Ltd., Co., Income Tax, the Income Tax Officer, Court, the Gujarat High Court, the Audit Department, Court, the High Court, the Income Tax Officer, the High Court, Court, Income Tax, Income Tax, Court, the Central Board of Revenue, the Controller of Estate Duty, Board, Court, Board, Board, Board, The Delhi High Court, Revenue Audit, the Income Tax Department, The High Court, Kerala High Court, the Revenue Audit, the Ministry of Law, the Provident Fund, Government, the Revenue Audit, the Ministry of Law, the Income Tax Officer, the Ministry of Law, the Revenue Audit, the Audit Department, the Income Tax Officers, the Provident Fund, Government, the Delhi High Court, the Kerala High Court, Court, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Elgin Mills Co. Ltd., Income Tax Officer, Income Tax v. Kalukutty, the Allahabad High Court, Kerala High Court, the Income Tax Department, the Internal Audit Manual, Internal Adit Mnual, the Income Tax Department, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
NORP: J.1, Roman, R. K., Hindu, R. K.
DATE: 1961, the years 1960-61, 1961-62, 1962-63, 1963-64, years 1960-61 to 1963-64, 1961, the years 1960-61, 1961-62, 1962-63, 1963-64, that year, that year, the assessment year, 1922, 1960, 1971.('16, July 28, 1971, 1971, 14., 1922, annual, 1961, annual, 1969]72ITR376(SC, 1953
CARDINAL: 2, 1971]80ITR188(Guj, 4, 1, 153, one, 1959]35ITR1(SC, 1968]67ITR11(SC, 39, 2, 3, 4. Audit, one, 9 and 10, 1976]102ITR287(SC, two, 1971]82ITR831(SC, 15, two, two, 1972]85ITR102(Ker, 1975]99ITR148(Delhi, 18, 1973]90ITR503(Ker, 1977]107ITR570(All, 1978]111ITR287(All, 2, 1961.21
PERSON: Indian, Delhi Bench, R.K. Malhotra, H.H. Smt, R.K. Malhotra, Kasturbhai Lalbhai, Law, Receipt, Paragraph 4, Law, Kalyanji Mavji, Kalyanji Mavji, Kasturbhai Lalbhai, View, Nawab, Mir Osman, H. H. Smt, Chand Kanwarji, Kalukutty, Nawab, Mir Osman, Khan Bahadur, R. K. Malhotra, Kasturbhai Lalbhai, H. H. Smt, Chand Kanwarji, Kalukutty, Assumed, Vashist Bhargava v. Income, Kasturbhai Lalbhai, Kumar Shrawan, Kumar v., Anr, Kanpur, Vol
GPE: Kasturbhai Lalbhai, Kasturbhai Lalbhai's, Clause, Singh, India, States, Singh, India, India
PRODUCT: Section 147 reads:-147, Bench, Malhotra, Bench, Malhotra
QUANTITY: 14/19/ 56-II
WORK_OF_ART: Controller of Estate Duty v.