New Indian Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Mandar Madhav Tambe and Others

Decided On : Dec-14-1995

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 96(2)(b)(ii, Section 96(2)(b)(ii, Section 96(2)(b)(ii, Section 2(5A, Chapter II, chapter II, the Motor Vehicles Act, Chapter II, Section 21(2)(c, Section 3, Section 7, Section 2(5A, Rule 96, Chapter II, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 2(5A

CARDINAL: 1, 1, 2, two, One, 1, 3., 1, 3., 3, 3, 3, 4., 3, 1, 1, 3, 5., 3, one, 8., 3, 9, 481, 481, 3, one, 10, two, 11, 2, 1, 6, 16, 16, 6, 3, One, two, one, one, 15, 3, 3, 1, 16

ORG: the Bombay High Court, Insurance Company, MTM, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the Motor Vehicles Act, the Insurance Policy, The High Court, Court, Learned Counsel, the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, United India Insurance Company Ltd., the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, United India Insurance Company Ltd., inter alia, the State Government, inter alia, the Bombay Motor Vehicles Rules, the Himachal Pradesh High Court, United India Insurance Company's, The High Court, the High Court

DATE: 4th July, 1979, 6327, 5348, 22nd July, 1977, 21st November, 1977, 4th July, 1979, 1939, 7th July, 1979, 9th July, 1979, 2nd June, 1984, 1985, 1985, 1939, nearly two years

PERCENT: 6%

PERSON: Suri, Tilak Ram, Tilak Ram, Driving Licence, Learner

ORDINAL: firstly, secondly, first

LOC: Eorn L