Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Rattan Lal and Co. and anr. Vs. the Assessing Authority and anr.

Decided On : Oct-29-1968

Court : Supreme Court of India

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: the Punjab Amendment Act, the Haryana Amendment Act.2, Section 15 of the Central Act, Section 15, the Central Act, Section 15, Section 5(2, Section 2, Section 2(ff, Section 15 of the Central Act Bhawani Mills, Section 5(1, Section 10(4, Section 15 of the Central Act, Section 5, Section 15(a, the Central Act, the Central Act, Section 5(2)(a)(vi, Section 12, Section 5(1, Section 15(1, the Central Act, Section 15(a, the Central Act, Section 5(2)(a, Section 12, the Central Act, Section 5(2, Section 12, the Amending Act 7 of 1967, Section 5, Section 2, Section 5, Section 11AA, the Central Act, Section 5(3, the Central Act, Section 11AA, Section 11AA, the Central Act, Section 15, Section 55, Section 11AA, Section 15, the Central Act, Constitution, Article 304 of the Constitution, Article 304, Article 304, Article 304, the Haryana Amendment Act, the Punjab Amendment Act, the Punjab Amending Act, Haryana Amendment Act also.25

ORG: Hidayatullah, the Punjab Legislature, the Punjab Sales Tax, State, the State of Punjab, the Central Sales Tax Act, The Punjab General Sales Tax Act, Bhawani Cotton Mills Ltd., Court, State of Punjab, the States of Punjab, the Punjab Legislature, State, State, State, State, Punjab General Sales Tax Act, Court, Cotton Milts Ltd.'s, the State Government, Mills, the Central Sales Tax, Department of Government, the State of Punjab, State, State, State, Act, Court, Court, Court, State, Court, State, the State Government, Assessing Authority, the Punjab General Sales Tax Amendment and Validation Act, the Punjab General Sales Tax, the Punjab General Sales Tax, the Punjab General Sales Tax, Bhawani Mills, Court, the Punjab Legislature, State, State, Slate, State, Tribunal, Court, State, State, Court, State, State, State, State

DATE: C.J. 1, 1967, 1967, 19.3, 1948, April 1, 1960, April 10, 1967 this, November 1, 1966, December 29, 1967, 1967, 1956, 54 of 1956, '15, 1948, later than six months, the year, April 1, 1960, '5, 1956, later than six months, the year, 1948, the assessment years 1960-61 1961-62, 1962-63, quarterly, the accounting year, every quarter, the quarter, '9, six months, the year, '10, '11, '12, 1956, 16th December, 1965, October 1, 1958, later than six months, the year, 1967, less than thirty days, thirty days, 1967, 1967, November 1, 1966, 1969

CARDINAL: 17, Thirteen, four, 1967]3SCR577, more than one, 5, more than one, one, 1, four, two, more than one, 2, 6, 5(1, 5(2)(a)(vi, 2, more than one, more than one, 2, two, one, more than one, more than one, more than one, 48-58, one, 1957]1SCR837, two, 1, more than one, 2, 3, 1, six, 2, 3, one, 13, 1, 2, 1, 3, 4, 14, two, 2)(d, more than 3, one, 1, 303, One

ORDINAL: second, second, second, second, first, second, first, first, First, second, second, 5th, first, second, first

WORK_OF_ART: Amending Acts, State of Punjab, The Amending Acts

PERSON: Articles 14, Anr, Haryana, Haryana, namely:--, Vaidialingam, Antihra Pradesh, A. V. Fernandez v. State, Haryana, Haryana, Jo, N. K. Nataraja Mudaliar, Articles 301

MONEY: three per cent

GPE: India, India, Clause, Kerala, India, Bhawani Mills, States, States, valorem

NORP: Punjab, Punjab

LOC: Madras, Madras

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //