Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Royal Talkies, Hyderabad and ors. Vs. Employees State Insurance Corporation

Decided On : Aug-09-1978

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 2(9, Section 2(9, Section 75, Section 75, Section 82, Constitution, Constitution, Section 41, Section 2(9, Constitution, Section 2(9, Section 2(9).17, Section 2(9)(i, Section 2(9)(ii, Section 2(9)(ii, Section 2(9)(ii, Section 2(9)(iii, Section 2(9, Section 45A, Section 2(9

PERSON: Krishna Iyer, Law, Shri Chitale, Secunderabad, Cinema, Principal, Shri Chitale, Counsel, James Fitzjames

NORP: J.1, Indian

ORDINAL: Secondly, Firstly

DATE: 1948, 39, 41, 42, 43, or(iii, 2 months, to-day, 1977)ILLJ479SC, 1799-1974

ORG: Court, The High Court, Hyderabad, the Employees State Insurance Act, the Employees Insurance Court, The Insurance Court, Exhibits P-7, Ex-P. 10, the Insurance Court, the Insurance Court, The Insurance Court, Court for Special Leave to Appeal, Bar, Preamble, Corporation, Inspectorate, the Insurance Court, the High Court, The High Court, and(i, Andhra Pradesh, Maxwell, Fowler, Court, Central Press

GPE: Act.3, us

CARDINAL: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8), 9, 10, 9, 38, 43A, one, five hundred, five-hundred, two, five, some one, three, two, 724

TIME: the show hours, the show hours, a few minutes, a few minutes, a minute

PRODUCT: P-10, P.W. 1's, Exhibit P-10, houses.6

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //