Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

G.S. Ramaswamy and ors. Vs. Inspector-general of Police, Mysore

Decided On : Jan-21-1964

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: the States Reorganisation Act, the States Reorganisation Act, the States Reorganisation Act, the State Reorganisation Act, the State Reorganisation Act, the State Reorganisation Act, Rule 401, the State Reorganisation Act, the States Reorganisation Act, the States Reorganisation Act

ORG: Wanchoo, the Mysore High Court, Court, the Mysore High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Hyderabad State, the Hyderabad District Police Act, the Hyderabad District Police Manual, the Government of Hyderabad, the Hyderabad District Police Act, the Commissioner of City Police of Hyderabad, the Inspector General of Police, the Inspector General of Police, City Police, the High Court, Coorg, State of Mysore, State of Mysore, State of Mysore, State of Mysore, State of Mysore, State, the Central Government, State, State, State, State of Mysore, State, Hyderabad State, State, State, the High Court, Hyderabad State, the State Government, the High Court, the Seniority Rules, Court, the State Government, State of Mysore, State of Mysore, State, State, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Circle Inspectors, State, State, the Seniority Rules, Government, the High Court, The High Court, State, the High Court, Court, the High Court, the Hyderabad District Police Manual, Circle Inspector, the Inspector General of Police, Court, State, the State Government, State, State, the State Government, the State Government, State of Mysore, State of Mysore, the State Government, State, State, State, the State Government, the State Government, the Mysore High Court, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, State, State, the Mysore Seniority Rules, the High Court, State of Mysore, State of Mysore, State of Mysore, State, State of Mysore, State, State, State, State, the State Government

CARDINAL: 1, six, six, Two, 173, 174, two, 2., 399, 3., one, 2, 1, 4., 2(c, 5., 2(c, 2(c, 6, six, six, six, six, two, two, 7., two, 399, 403, 399, 403, 400, 102, 401, 486, 486, 486, 486, 8., 486, 486, 1963)ILLJ671SC, 486, 486, 9, two, 10, four, one, 116(2, one, one, one, 11, 2(c, 12, 13, 2(c, 2(c, four, 115, 2(c, 2(c, 2(c, 2(c, 14, 15

DATE: the month of October 1956, 1956, November, 1, 1956, November 1, 1956, November 1, 1956, November 1, 1956, September 6, 1962, 1957, November 1, 1956, February 1958, 1962, 1962, years, November 1, 1956, the year, year, year, a period of, two years, two years, the period of two years', those two years, more than two years, two years, more than two years, February 1958, November 1, 1956, 1958, 1958, November 1, 1956

GPE: the States of, Bombay, Hyderabad, States, States, Singh v. State of Punjab, States, States, States, States, States, States, States, States

PERSON: Madras

ORDINAL: first, first, first, firstly, secondly, first, first

NORP: r.

PRODUCT: Rules 401

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //