The State of Maharashtra and P.C. Singh Vs. Dr. Praful B. Desai and anr.

Decided On : Apr-01-2003

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 273, Section 338, the Indian Penal Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, Article 21, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 273, Section 273, Section 273, Section 273, Section 273, Section 295, Section 296, Section 273, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 273, Section 273, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 167(2, Section 273, the VIth Amendment, the US Constitution, Section 273, Section 273, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 273, Section 273, Chapter VIII, Section 273, Section 273, Section 273, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 3, the Indian Evidence Act, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Evidence Act, Section 45, Section 138, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 313, Section 313, Article 21 of the Constitution of India, Section 273, Section 273, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 284, SRO 2164, Section 3, Section 508-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 504 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 504, Section 285

ORG: Variava, the Bombay High Court, The High Court, SLP, the State of Maharashtra, SLP, the Criminal Appeal, SLP, Sloan Kettering Memorial Hospital, the Bombay Hospital, the Bombay Hospital, the Maharashtra Medical Council, the Metropolitan Magistrate, 23rd Court, Court, Court, Court, the High Court, The High Court, the Criminal Application, the State of Maharashtra, Respondents, Legislature, Siva Kumar Chadda v. Municipal Corporation, Court, Commissions, Court, Parliament, Legislature, the State of Andhra Pradesh, the Confrontation Clause, Courts, the Confrontation Clause.11, the High Court, The High Court, High Courts, the Judgment of the High Court, The High Court, The High Court, Court, the Supreme Court of USA, the High Court, Court, inquiry;such, Court, Court, Court, Parliament, Court, Parliament, Act, Parliament, Parliament, National Textile Workers' Union, Court, Income Tax, State, SIL Import USA v. Exim Aides Silk Exporters, Court, Court, Court, Court, Respondents, Court, Court, Video Conferencing, Reliance, Sections 274, Magistrate, Court, VSNL, Magistrate, Court, Court, Magistrate, Court, Sections, Court, Contempt of Court, Court, Contempt of Court, Court the Criminal Procedure Code, Sections 284, COMMISSION, Court, Court, Magistrate, State, the Administrator of a Union Territory, Court, Court, COMMISSION, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, State, Court, the Central Government, the Central Government, Court, the Central Government, Court, Justice, Court, Court, the Government of United States of America, Reliance, Court, Commission, Commissions, SRO, the Government of India, the Government of the United Kingdom, the Government of Canada, the Government of India, the Government of the Federal Republic of West Germany, the Government of India, the Government of the Federal Republic of West Germany, State, State, State, Court, Court, the Government of India, Court, the Government of India, Video-Conferencing, Commission, Commission, Judicial, Court, Court, Court, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Judicial, VSNL, Court, Court, Court, VSNL, Magistrate, the Consulate/Embassy, the Consulate/Embassy, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Magistrate, Court, Magistrate, Appeals, State, Appeals

NORP: J.1, Maharashtra

DATE: 23rd/24th April 2001, 2001, the last 40 years, 22nd December 1987, more than 3 1/2 months, 8th July, 1996, 29th June 1998, 16th August 1999, December 2000, any day, today, today, the years, '15, 1983)ILLJ45SC, today, November 18, 1953, November 28, 1953, September 9, 1969, September 9, 1969, one year, today

PERSON: P.C. Singh, P.C. Singh, Ernest Greenberg, Greenberg, A.K. Mukherjee, A.K. Mukherjee, A.K. Mukherjee, A.K. Mukherjee, Greenberg, Greenberg, Greenberg, Greenberg, Greenberg, Jaisingh, Counsels, Sundaram, Ashok, A.K. Gopalan v. State, Nazir Ahmed v. Emperor, Ordinance, Santra Aun Craig, Sri Krishna Gobe, Francis Bennion, Bhagwati, P.R. Ramakrishnan, Francis Bennion, S.J. Chowdhury, Basavaraj R. Patil v. State, Accused, Sundaram, Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, Greenberg, Ratilal Bhanji Mithani, Notifications Nos, Jaising, Greenberg, Greenberg, Greenberg, Greenberg, Dr Greenberg, Greenberg, Greenberg

PRODUCT: Judgment, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, SRO 2163, Respondent

CARDINAL: 2001).Mr, one, 20/25, 5., 109, 114, six, two, 21, 1950CriLJ1383, 284, 299, 497, 273, One, 617:'It, 256, 1997]226ITR625(SC, 1999CriLJ2276, 2000CriLJ4604, one, One, demeanour, 275, 289, 285, 1972CriLJ1055, 798, 504, 508, two, 508, two, 504, 508, 508, one

GPE: New York, USA, Mumbai, India, India, India, India, Delhi, Contemporanea, USA, USA, Maryland, US, Bombay, Karnataka, Accused, Contemporany, South Africa, Accused, India, India, India, India, India, India, USA, India, USA, Germany, India, Germany, Sections, Courts, India, the United Kingdom, Canada, the Federal Republic of West Germany, India, West Germay, made.27, West Germany, India, India, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, India, India, U.S.A., USA, India, USA, India, India

LOC: Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Esplanade, Respondent, Madras, Accused, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent

EVENT: the Sixth Amendment (Confrontation Clause).12, World Cup

ORDINAL: first, First, Secondly, second

WORK_OF_ART: 2nd Edition

FAC: the Gazette of India Part II, Sections 504, Sections 504