Amrit Banaspati Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Decided On : Jul-27-1964

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: the Validation Act, the Validation Act, the Validation Act, the Validation Act, the Indian Coinage Act, the Coinage Act, the Coinage Act, Section 13', Section 14, section 13, section 13, the Mysore Existing Laws (Construction of References to Values, Section 3, section 14, the Indian Coinage Act, Central Act III, section 14, Constitution, the Indian Coinage Act, the Amending Act 31 of 1955, Constitution, Article 265 of the Constitution and, Constitution, the Mysore Act, the Mysore Act, the Indian Coinage Act, the Indian Coinage Act, Act 31 of 1955, the U.P. Act XXV, Act 31 of 1955, the Coinage Act, Section 13 of the Coinage Act III, Act 28 of 1947, Section 14, Act 31 of 1955, section 13, section 13, Constitution, the Mysore Existing Laws (Construction of Reference to Values, Act 31 of 1955, the Indian Coinage Act, the Coinage Act

CARDINAL: 887, 888, 483, 484, 6, 6, one, 1, 2, 1, 2, 13, 6, 887, 888, two, 6, 2, 3, 14, 6, 13, 1, 1, 2, 1, half, ten, 3, one, 14, 1, one hundred, half, quarter, one hundred, fifty, twenty-five, 1, 2, 2, sixteen, sixty-four, one hundred and ninety-two, one hundred, 1, one, 3, 1, 2, 2, one, one, two, 16, 64, 192, 100, 1, 14, 2, 2, 7, 6, 5, 43 3/4, 37 1/2, 31 1/2, 31, 44, 31, 7, 5, 37, below 37 1/2, 38, 37, one, one, Seven, one, 6, seven, 42, 44, five, 8, 10, one, 2, 2, 14, two, two, 3, 3, 2, 2, 2, 16, 64, 192, 100, 3, 3, 3, 14, 2, 2, 3, 2, 6, 34,355, 6.25, 34,355, 6, one, nine, 2, 14, 16, 9, 9, 2,00,559, five, 9, 51, 8,05,726 65, 5, 6,44,661 32, 1,61,065 33, 3, 2, 14, 16, 64, 192, 100, 3, 1, 1, 275, 3, 91,690, two, 3, 2, 14, 25,038, two, 3, 1, 2, 2, 3, 277, 3, 91,690, 25,038, 3, 279, Two, 2, 3, 199, 207, 300/192, 19/16, 2, 2, 2, 3, two, 279, one, 278, 1, 2, 14, 100, 2, 14, 3, 1, 2, 3, 14, 3, 3, 1, 3, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 3, 3, 14, 13, 14, 16, 64, 192, 1 00, 14, 1, 2, 1, 14(3, 34,385, 13, 14, 1, half, ten, one, 2, 1, one hundred, one hundred, fifty, twenty-five, 1, 2, 2, sixteen, sixty-four, one hundred and ninety-two, one hundred, 1, one, 3, 1, 2, 1, 14, a hundred, fifty, twenty-five, 2, sixteen, sixty-four, one hundred, one hundred, 2, 3, 2, two, 2, 3, 2, one, 2, 2, 3, 3, 2, 3, 3, 3, 2, three, 14, two, 91,690, 3, 198, 199, 207, 12, 3, 14, 3, 1, 2, three, 1, 1, 275, 3, 2, 3, 91,690, two, one, 14(3, 2, six, 6, 1, 1, 275

DATE: 1963, October 23, 1961, 1961, July 27, 1964, 1003, 1961, 1958, 1958, October 15, 1960, February 1, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1963, the years 1955-56, 1956-57, 1957-58, 1906, 1906, 1955, 1962, the 24th day of January, 1942, s. 13, 100/64, 100/192, 44, 37, 1003, 1961, the years 1956-57, 1963, 1957, 1957, 1906, 1906, 1957, 1906, the assessment years 1956-57, 1957-58, 1948, 1948, March 31, 1956, 1962, 1906, 2514, 25116, 25148, 1948, 1955, 1,16,72-44, 1957, 1),(2, 1963, March 31, 1956, 61, 1963

ORG: the Allahabad High Court, The Judgment of the Court, Amrit Banaspati Co. Ltd., the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, the U.P. Sales Tax Validation Act, the High Court, the U. P. Sales Tax Act, Court, J. K. Jute Mills Co. Ltd., State of Uttar, the Allahabad High Court, the High Court, Court, the Jute Mills', Case(1, the High Court, Court, Court, Mills, Case(1, the U.P. Sales Tax Act, the Sales Tax Authority, the Central Government, s.(2, Court, Court, Court, the Beedi Works Case, the Mysore Sales Tax Act, the High Court, Court, the Mysore Sales Tax Act, Money Bills, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the High Court, SHAH, Court, J. K. Jute Mills Co. Ltd., State of Uttar, the Taxing Authorities, the Central Government, Legislature, Legislature, Court, The State of Mysore, the Mysore Sales Tax Act 6, the Mysore Sales Tax Act, the High Court of Mysore, Arts, the State Legislature, Court, Court, the State of Uttar Pradesh, Court, the Sales Tax Department, the Mysore Sales Tax Act, State, Case(1

PERSON: S. K. Kapur, B. L. Khanna, S. Murty, C. B. Agarwala, C. P. Lal, S. P. Bhasin, Meerut, Ram Kishan Sunder Lal v. State, Uttar, S.T. C. 92, paise s respectively, Coins, M. G. Beedi Works v. State, Bee", Articles 198, Money Bill, naye, Raghubar Dayal, Beedi Works, Paise, Paise

NORP: J.The

QUANTITY: 1 anna, 1 anna, 1 anna, 1 anna, one-anna, one-anna, 1 anna, one anna, one anna, 58,36,422.25 nPs

ORDINAL: second, first, Firstly

LOC: Single, the Indian Coinage (Amendment

FAC: the Official Gazette, anna per rupee, the Official Gazette

GPE: naye, S.C.R., Paisas, Paisas

PRODUCT: Supp, Supp

PERCENT: -02 nPs

WORK_OF_ART: Vanaspati, Vanaspati