Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

The Commissioner of Income Tax, West Bengal 1, Calcutta Vs. Vegetables Products Ltd.

Decided On : Jan-29-1973

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 271(1)(a)(i, Section 23B, Section 23(2, Section 22(2, Section 28(3, Section 297(2)(g, Section 274(1, Section 156, Section 143 of the Act, Section 271(1)(a)(i, Section 271(1)(a)(i, Section 143 of the Act, Section 156, Section 271(1)(a)(i, Section 271(1)(a)(i, Section 271(1)(a)(i, Section 271(1)(a)(i, Section 139, Section 271(1)(a)(i, Section 271(1)(a)(i, Section 143, Section 156, Section 156, Section 271(1)(a)(i, Section 271(1)(a)(i, Section 271(1)(a)(i

PERSON: K.S. Hegde, Manchanda, Manchanda, B. Sen, S.V. Gupta, Counsel, M.M. Annaiah v. Commissioner

NORP: J.1, Indian, Punjab, I.T.R.

ORG: the Calcutta High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, The High Court, Tribunal, Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, Learned Counsel, the Lahore High Court, the Delhi High Court, Hindustan Industrial Corporation, The Delhi High Court, the Lahore High Court, the Mysore High Court, Court, Appellate, Delhi High Courts

PRODUCT: Calcutta, the 'Act', Calcutta

DATE: 1961, 1922, the assessment year 1960-61, year ending, December 31, 1959, 1922, June 1, 1960, June 13, July 18, 1960, July 18, 1960, two months, January 16, 1961, the very next day, January 17, 1961, the assessment year, October 31, 1962, April 1, 1961, 1961, the assessment year, February 2,1961, the 1st day of April, 1965

QUANTITY: 92,294/55, 92,294/55

GPE: Vir, Delhi, Counsel, Lahore

CARDINAL: 1972]86ITR657(Delhi, 74, 582, one, two, 10, more than one, Two

MONEY: two per cent, fifty per cent, 2 per cent, 50 per cent

ORDINAL: first, first, first

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //