Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

The Petlad Turkey Red Dye Works Co. Ltd., Petlad Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay, Ahmedabad

Decided On : Nov-02-1962

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 66A, section 66, Constitution, the Code of Civil Procedure

CARDINAL: 1, two, 16, 2., 14,22,996/-, 14,22,996/-, 11,88,063/-, under s. 66, 3, two, 4, 5, two, 6, two, 1, 2, 66, 1, 2, 66, 4, 66, 5, 66, one, 51, 66, 50, 212, 50, 212, 39, 39, 7, 2, 8, one, 136, 3, 2, 50, 212, 9, 1951]19ITR108(SC, 31, 50, 10, 133, 1, 2, 66, 1960]39ITR540(SC, 4, one, 66, one, 12, 1960]40ITR552(SC, 219, 13, 1961]42ITR589(SC, 2, 1, 66, 1954]25ITR259(SC, 14, 15, 16

ORG: the High Court, Baroda State, British India, Baroda State, Baroda State, Appellate, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, The Appellate Tribunal, The High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, The High Court, British India, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal's, Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, The Privy Council, the High Court's, Tata Iron & Steel Co., General Mills Co. Ltd., Tata Iron and Steel Co.'s, the Privy Council, the High Court, the High Court, the Privy Council, the High Court, the Chief Revenue Authority, the Bombay High Court, The Privy Council, the High Court, the Privy Council, Delhi Cloth & General Mills Co.'s, the High Courts, the Privy Council, the Adaptation Order, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court', the Supreme Court, the High Court, Delhi Cloth & General Mills Co.'s, Delhi Cloth & General Mills Co.'s, the High Court, Tata Iron & Steel Co's, The State of Bihar, the Bihar Sales Tax Act, the High Court, the Board of Revenue, the High Court, the High Court, Tata Iron and Steel Co's, the High Court, the Bihar Sales Tax Act, the High Court, Jethanand & Sons v. State, U.P., The State of Bombay, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, The New Jahangir Vakil Mills, The High Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, The Appellate Tribunal, Taxation Concessions Order, The High Court, the Taxation Concessions Order, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal's, Tribunal, Zoraster and Co., the Central Government F. O. R. Jaipur, the High Court, the High Court, The High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, Government, the High Court, the New Jehangir Vakil Mill's, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Scindia Steam Navigation Co. Ltd., the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Tribunal, the New Jehangir Vakil Mill's, Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court

GPE: Bombay, the Indian States, India, India, Petlad, India, India, Petlad, India, India, Bhavnagar, Bhavnagar, Bhavnagar, Bombay, India, Baroda State, the Merged States, Baroda State, Baroda State, Jaipur, Jaipur

DATE: 1955, the assessment years, years, 1941-42, 1942-43, the previous years, the calendar year 1940 and 1941, the previous years, years 1941-42, 1942-43, the previous year, 1941-42, that year, the previous year, 1942-43, the years, two assessment years, February 21, 1955, the assessment year 1941-42, year 1942-43, September 23, 1955, the assessment year 1941-42, the year 1942-43, April 21, 1960, September 23, 1955, 1923, 1927, 1923, 1927, 24 of 1926, 1950, 1927, 1927, 1923, 1923, 1961]3SCR754, 1958, 1007

NORP: British, British, British, British, Indian, British, British, Indian, British

LOC: British India, British India

PRODUCT: Calcutta

WORK_OF_ART: I.T. Reference No, L.R. 54 IndAp 421, L.R. 54 IndAp 421, L.R. 54 IndAp 421, L.R. 54 IndAp 421

ORDINAL: third, first, Secondly

PERSON: L.R., Delhi Cloth, L.R., Art, L.R., Seth Premchand Satramdas, L.R., Fazal Ali, J., Art, Sardar Syedna, Kusumben D. Mahadevia v.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //