Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Tiam House Services Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of
Decided On : Sep-23-1991
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras
LAW: Section 289, the Indian Companies Act, Section 40A(5, Section 40(c)(iii, Section 40(a)(v, Section 40(c)(iii, Section 40(a)(v, Section 40A(5, Section 17(3)(ii, Section 17(3)(ii, Section 40(a)(v, Section 40(a)(v, Section 40(a)(v, Section 37
CARDINAL: 1, 26, 2,54,994, One, 17, 17, 4,250, 450, 4,500, two, at least four, three, 3-4-1985, 1.84, five, four, one, 1.84, 2,54,994, 2,54,994, 1, 17, 4,500, 2, 3, 1/5th, 3-4-1985, 4.7, 2,54,994, 22, 5,11,340, 2,54,994, 26, 1/5th, 1, 137, 4, 158, 458, One, two, 40(c)(iii).7, 3-4-1985, 84, 5, 157, 212, 124, 15,430, 9,500, 9,500, 135, 19, 1, 94, 311, 1,500, 1,500, 2, 98, one, 100, 3, 55,956, 16,595, 57,562, 63,348, 72,551, 440, 1977, 106, 758, 759, 33,667, 33,667, 1/3rd, three, 2,54,994, 2,54,994, 66,10,000
PERSON: Madras, Arunachalam, Shri Arunachalam, Arunachalam, Shri Arunachalam, Shri Arunachalam, Murugappa, Lalitha Kameswaran, Madras, Shri Arunachalam, Shri Venkatachalam, Shri Arunachalam, Donald Ross, Arunachalam, Arunachalam, Valli Alagappan, 2,57.875, Shri Arunachalam, Shri Arunachalam, Shri Arunachalam, Arunachalam, Shri Arunachalam, Shri Arunaehalam, Shri Arunachalam, Madras, Shri Arunachalam, Shri Arunachalam, Shri Arunachalam, Shri Arunachalam, Shri Arunachalam, Shri Arunachalam, Dass, Carlton Hotel, Rs, Shri Arunachalam
DATE: year 1986-87, the seven weeks, 10-7-1972, monthly, 1986, 1956, seven weeks, April 1985 to end of, May 1985, the assessment year 1986-87, the year, the assessment year 1986-87, 1982, 1986, 1961, 1972, 1986, 1980, 1982, 1974, 100 per month, 1975, 200 per month, 200 per month, 1951, 1953, two years, 1952, 1953, the assessment year 1952-53, the assessment year 1954-55, 1,20,910, 1 -5-1985, the assessment year 1959-60, the assessment year
ORG: Shri A.M.M. Arunachalam, etc.to its group, Tube Investment of India Ltd., Carborandum Universal Ltd., South Asian Financial Exchange Ltd., M/s.Ashok Leyland Ltd., M/s. CWS (India) Ltd., ICI Ltd., Southern Energy Development Corporation, Universal Cables Ltd., Royapettah Hospital, The Board of Directors, National Hospital, Smt, A.R. Lakshmi, the Reserve Bank's, Tribunal, Shri R.V. Easwaran, Indian Leaf Tobacco Development Co. Ltd., CIT, CIT v. Alkali &, Chemical Corporation of India Ltd., Manjushree Plantations Ltd. 's, National &, Grindlays Bank Ltd. 's, the Calcutta High Court, the Calcutta High Court, the Calcutta High Court, Indian Leaf Tobacco Development Co. Ltd. 's, the High Courts, Board, CIT v. Supreme Motors, the High Court, the Calcutta High Court, CIT, Karam Chand Thapar &, ITR, the Delhi High Court, CIT, The Delhi High Court, the Delhi High Court, Reliance, CIT v. Commonwealth Trust Ltd., Manjushree Plantations Ltd.'s, Tribunal, CIT, Tribunal, Tribunal, United Mills Ltd., CIT, Bombay Hospital Trust, Appellate, Tribunal, The Bombay High Court, the Bombay Hospital Trust, the Bombay Hospital, the Bombay Hospital Trust, Bombay High Court, Mehboob Productions, CIT, the Academy of Arts and Sciences, Academy, Appellate, Tribunal, The Bombay High Court, Tribunal, the Bombay High Court, Mehboob Productions
GPE: United Kingdom, the United Kingdom, India, U.K., India, India, U.K., London, U.K., U.K., U.S., U.K., Delhi, Jodhpur, Bros., Pakistan, India, USA, Hollywood, India, India
ORDINAL: fifth, second, firstly, first, first, Thirdly
MONEY: 5150
PRODUCT: 827, 706, the Full Bench