Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Maktool Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Decided On : Mar-17-1999

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Act No, Section 33, Section 27, Section 27, Section 36B of the Act, Section 389, Section 389, Section 32A of the Act, Section 32A of the Act, Chapter XXXII, Article 72 of the Constitution of India, Article 161, Constitution, another Constitution Bench, Constitution, Section 32A of the NDPS Act, Section 432 of the Code, Section 32A in NDPS Act, Section 32A in the Act, Act 2 of 1989, Section 37 of the Act, Section 32A, Section 27 of the Act, Section 27', Section 27, Section 32A., Section 26, Section 26, Section 27, Section 27, Section 32A of the Act, Section 389(3, Section 26, Section 36B, Section 32A of the Act, Section 32A, Section 26 of the Act, Section 389(3, Section 389(3, Section 27, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Criminal Procedure Code.26

PERSON: K.T. Thomas, Chapters XXIX, XXX, Chapter XXIX, Kehar Singh v. Union, Articles 72, Reasons, Bill No, Reasons, Joseph @ Ravi v. State, R.Crl, Joseph v. State, Handa, Joseph @ Ravi v. State, it.22, Berlin Joseph's, Joseph

DATE: J. 1, 1985, 1989, 1973, 1973, 1973, 1985, '15, any quarter, 1973, five years, 1973, three years, one year, 1992, 1221, 1992, 1993, 1992

ORG: the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, High Courts, Court, the High Court, CrPC, CrPC, The High Court, CrPC, a High Court, Special Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Learned Counsel, Section, Parliament, the High Court, Parliament, Government, Sections 432 and, Parliament, Government, Union, Government of a State, State, Court, Maru Ram v. Union of India, Court, State, Sections 432 and, the 'Statement of Objects, the 'Statement of Objects, Parliament, non-bailable.-, CrPC, the Public Prosecutor, CrPC, Counsel, Parliament, Learned Counsel, Parliament Section 26, Parliament, Rajasthan High Court, Madhya Pradesh High Court, the Delhi High Court, The Delhi High Court, the Gujarat High Court, Jyotiben Ramlal Purohit, the Gujarat High Court, the Gujarat High Court, the Government under Sections 432, Learned Counsel, High Courts, Parliament, the High Courts, Registry, the High Court

CARDINAL: 2, 3).6, two, 432, 435, 433, 433, 1980CriLJ1440, 161, 161, 433, 125/1988, One, 1, 1, 26, 27, 1, 514, 2, 466, 1, 1996)1GLR395, Three, three, 433, 434

ORDINAL: First, Second, First, Second, Third, second, third

WORK_OF_ART: Suspension, Remission and Commutation of Sentences'

GPE: India, functions.12, Berlin, KLT, Anwar v. State, Rajendra, Singh v. State of, Singh v. State, Berlin, Berlin, Gujarat, Berlin

PRODUCT: Articles 72, a Full Bench of, the Full Bench, a Full Bench

FAC: the Lok Sabha

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //