Dwarka Nath Vs. Income-tax Officer, Special Circle D-ward, Kanpur and anr.

Decided On : Mar-29-1965

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: section 33A of the Act, section 29, section 33A, article 226 of the constitution.5, Article 226 of the Constitution, article 226 of the Constitution with, section 33A(2, section 33, section 33, section 33, section 33, Section 33, the Amending Act, section 33, Section 33, section 33A of the Act, section 29, article 226 of the constitution for the, article 225, article 226 of the constitution other, section 33A(2, section 29, section 33A(2, section 12B, section 29, section 29, section 29, Section 29 of the Act

CARDINAL: 1, II, 3, 8, 32,500, 26,362, II, 65,012, II, 65, 65, one, one, 11, 11,230, 65, 2,98,909, 65, 2, two, 8, 1, 2, 3, two, 1, 2, 3, two, 2, 428, 2, 428, 2, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 1, 19, 1,2,3, 50, 4, 31, 50, 17, 29, 30, 43, 47, 49, 1(2, one, 1(4, two, 29

ORG: Gujarat Cotton Mills Co. Ltd., the ", the "Kanpur group, the Agency Firm at Rs, the Kanpur Group, Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, inter alia, the Appellate Tribunal, Appellate, Appellate, the Bombay High Court, Court, the Bombay Group, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, the Bombay High Court, The High Court, the High Court, Appellate, Court, the High Court, the High Court, High Courts, the High Courts, the High Court, the High Courts, Court, Rex v. Electricity Commissioners, London County Council, Legal Aid Committee, Legal Aid Committee, the Andhra Pradesh State Government, the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, the Examination Committee, Board of High School and Intermediate Education, the Revenue Board, Board of revenue, the Examination Committee, the Board of Revenue, Appellate, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Appellate, Appellate, Reliance, Judicial, Tribune Trust, the Judicial Committee, the High Court, Board, Board, the High Court, Board, the Privy Council, the High Courts, the Privy Council, Union of India, Cuddapah, Cuddapah Star Transport Co., Ltd., Court, The High Court, the High Court of Allahabad, the Rules of Court, Allahabad, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, the Bombay High Court, Sons, the High Courts, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Income-, Appellate, Appellate, Court

GPE: Ahmedabad, Bombay, Bombay, Karta, Bombay, England, India, England, England, India, England, Rex v., Province, Bombay, India, Halsbury, guidance.10, Bombay, Bombay, India, assessee

DATE: the year 1938, February 28, 1938, February 26, 1938, September, 1946, September, 1946, September 7, 1946, November 15, 1946, October 30, 1946, the year 1948-49, June 5, 1952, 1922, March 26, 1954, August 3, 1953, S. 29, March 5, 1956, March 8, 1957, September 27, 1956, September 28, 1955, March 28, 1959, March 8, 1957, November 18, 1957, July 28, 1959, 2071, 1959, March 28, 1959, September 28, 1955, the years, 1952, 1952, 55, 56, one year, one year, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 20, 21, 25, 27, 29, 32, 34, 37, 38, 41, 42, 44, 46, 18, 19, 22, 23, 24, 26, 28, 33, 36, 39, 40, 48, 50, March 5, 1956

PERSON: Pira Mal Girdhar Lal, Kanpur, Chhattu Ram, Dwarkanath, Ramji Prasad, Delhi Bench, Lucknow, A. V. Viswanatha Sastri, Gopal Singh, T. C. Basappa v., Nagappa, Irani, Scrutton, Kusald S. Advani, Parker, J., Parker, J., U. P. v., Ghanshyam Das Gupta, U. P. v. Sardarni Vidyawati, suo motu, Sitalpore Colliery Concern, Chapter XXII, Dhruva Das, Baijnath Chaturbhuj v. Commissioner, Chhatturam, Sri Gopal Behari, Delhi Bench

NORP: Hindu, English, English, R., English, R., Rules, Act.26

ORDINAL: first, 3rd, third, second

PRODUCT: Article, the Act XXIII of 1941, Calcutta

FAC: Atkin L.J., Suganchand Saraogi