Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

income-tax Officer Vs. Mangalchand Bhanwar Lal and Co.

Decided On : May-07-1991

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur

LAW: Section 206, the Companies Act, Section 43(5, Section 263, Section 263, Section 147(a).He, Section 28, Section 73, Section 43(5, the IT Act, Section 108(1A, the Companeis Act, Section 206, the Companies Act, Section 108(1A, he Companies Act, Section 43(5

CARDINAL: 1, 2,73,053, 12,43,058, 2,73,053, 100, 121, 180, 181, 89,914, 2,73,053, 2,73,053, 2, 2,73,053, 11akh, 77, 410, 128, 160, 243, 126, 117, 118, 125, 135, one, 2,73,053, 112, 132, 113, 115, 1982(page 114, 116, 1,40,000

ORG: Department, Mangalchand Bhanwarlal &amp, Travancore Cement Co., ITO, ITO, M/s, ITO, M/s, Co., ITO, M/s, Rathi Alloys, ITO, ITO, ITO, Co., Department, Department, ITO, Reliance, CIT, SC, NirmalTrading Co., CIT, SC, Swadeshi Cotton Mills Co. Ltd., CIT, CIT, ITR, Departmental Representative, DO, ITO, Ward, Churu, M/s, Co., M/s, ITO, ITO, CIT, Dalmia Dadri Cement Ltd., CIT, Belpahar Refractories Ltd., ITR 610, CIT, Manaklal Porwal, the Calcutta High Court, CIT v. Jessop &amp, Co. Ltd., the Rajasthan High Court, Smt, SOT 1.739, Tribunal, ITO, IAC, ITO, Departmental Representative, Davenport &amp, P.) Ltd., the Supreme Court, Explanation, Nirmal Trading Co., the Supreme Court, Swadeshi Cotton Mills Co. Ltd., ITO, ITO, Belpahar Refractories Ltd., the Orissa High Court, Manaklal Porwal, Smt, ITO, ITO, ITO, 134 &amp, ITO, ITO, ITO, IAC, IAC, ITO, Rathi Alloys, ITO, ITO, ITO, Delhi Stock Exchange Association Ltd., ITO, delVered, ITO, Department, ITO

DATE: 25th March, 1986, the assessment year 1982-83.2, the assessment year, 11th Aug., 1981, 8th January, 1982, subsequent years, the assessment year 1981-82, 1,49,053, 21st March, 1984, the assessment year 1982-83, 1981-82, 4, the assessment year 1981-82, the assessment year 1981-82, 1975, 1980, 54, 1989, 1990, 2155, 28th February, 1985, the assessment year, the assessment year 1982-83, 12,43,453, the preceding year, preceding year, 10th March, 1985, the assessment year 1981-82, 17th April, 1978, year 1982-83, the second year, 1981-82, the assessment year 1981-82, 1982-83, 1970, 1981, 1986, 1988, 28th February, 1985, 21st March, 1984, year 1981-82, 17th April, 1978, the assessment year 1981-82, 21st March, 1984, February, 1984, 17th February, 1984, February 1984, that year, a particular year, that year, an earlier year, a subsequent year, two assessment years, the third assessment year, February, 1985, the last year, the assessment year 1982-83, the preceding assessment year 1981, 1981-82, 28th February, 1985, the end of the year, 11th August, 1981, 8th Jan., 1982, 8th January, 1982, the same day, 1956, 13th March, 1985, 1956, this regard.11, 27th August, 1984, 30th March, 1985, 20th January, 1982, 21st February, 1982, 21st February, 1982, 21st February, 1982, 21st March, 21st February 1982, 25th February, 1982, 1956, 2nd March, 1984

GPE: Jodhpur, Co., Sardarshahar, Kottayam, Delhi, Co., Delhi, Delhi, Co., New Delhi, Co., D.O., case.10, Deptl

WORK_OF_ART: Vambanad Brand

PRODUCT: ITO.It, LAC

PERSON: Swaroop Kakani, Shri M.C. Gupta, GaneshRam Swaroop Kakani, Manaben Bipinbhai v. ITO, Shri Gupta, Shri Gupta, Swaroop Kakani, Rajasthan, Manaben Bipinbhai, Justified, S.K. Kundra, Shri H.C.Gupta, Shri Khandelwal

ORDINAL: firstly, secondly, 6th, 6th, 7th

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //