Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Mahesh Chandra Vs. Regional Manager, U.P. Financial Corporation and Others
Decided On : Feb-12-1992
Court : Supreme Court of India
LAW: Article 136 of the Constitution, Constitution, Article 43, Act 63 of 1951, Section 29, Section 24, Section 24, Section 29, Section 29, Section 29, Section 29, Section 24, Section 29, Section 29, Indian Trust Act, Section 37, Section 29:24, Section 29, Section 52
NORP: J.1, Hindu, Mandamus
ORG: Managing Partner of M/s., Nagina, Distt, Uttar Pradesh, Railway Goods Shed, the U.P. Financial Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Rs. 3,28,717.97, Corporation, Deshbandhu Agarwal, Corporation, Court, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, State, Bharat, The State of Uttar Pradesh, the State Financial Corporation Act, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Board, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, the Public Sector Enterprise, the Public Sector, Erosion of Working Capital, Results, Government, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, State, Corporation, Corporation, Court, Government, State, Kernal, Justice, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Maitland, Equity, Trusteeship, Corporation, Corporation, Kerr on Receivers 17th Edition, Corporation, Fertiliser Corporation Kamgar Union, Ors, v. Union of India and Ors, Court, Authorities, Government, In Ram & Shyam Co., State, Haryana this Court, State, Sachidanand Pandey, Court, State, Kerala Financial Corporation, Court, State, Court, C.I.T., Court, Government, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation
PERSON: Shiva Rice Mill, Nos, Nos, Nos, Mahatma Gandhiji, Meerut, Malcolm S. Adiseshaiah, Kasturilal Laxmi, Issac, Issac, N. Swyanarayan Iyer's, Haji T.M. Hassan, Lakshmanasami Gounder v., Selvamani, J., Nos
CARDINAL: two, 208, 220/2, 8, 208, 2,700, one, 4,28,000, eleven, 220, two, 65,000, 50,000, 6, 1,93,670, 3,70,660, 3,835, 65,000, 5,03,165, 221, 220, 219, 219, 221, 220, two, 2,00,000, 2,55,000, 63,750, half, 220, 40,000, 92, millions, 38, 39, 220, two, 5,00,000, five, two, fifty thousands, four, 3,78,660, 74,000, 3,29,000, 5,00,000, 220, one, transferee, 6, 2,55,000, One, half, 42, 43, 1980]3SCR1338, One, two, one, 275, one, 208, 919, 1981)ILLJ193SC, 1987]2SCR223, One, 1988]1SCR1079, 1992)1SCC91, one, 2, 2,55,000, 5, 3, 5, 220/2, One, one, five, 220, 219, 221
DATE: 18, 1979, 1980, annual, 1991, December, 1981, December 22, 1983, February 10, 1986, March 31, 1986, September, 1985, January 13, 1987, March 25, 1987, four years, yearly, February 9, 1990, February 10, 1986, October 31, 1951, 20 years, 1986, 1980, 1986, year, year, annual, 45, 46, 1987, '17, 39, nepotism.20, day, daily, four years of half, four weeks, six months'
GPE: Bishwas, Highway, Swaraj, India, States, Trusts, Halsbury, Sindri
FAC: the Railway Station
ORDINAL: third, firstly, secondly, First, Second, first, third, third, 3rd, third, third, third, third, third, first
PERCENT: 25%, 18%, 25%
TIME: the idle hours
WORK_OF_ART: Economist, 'The Why, Problem of Loss-Making Units, 4th Edition, Vol