Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Mahesh Chandra Vs. Regional Manager, U.P. Financial Corporation and Others

Decided On : Feb-12-1992

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Article 136 of the Constitution, Constitution, Article 43, Act 63 of 1951, Section 29, Section 24, Section 24, Section 29, Section 29, Section 29, Section 29, Section 24, Section 29, Section 29, Indian Trust Act, Section 37, Section 29:24, Section 29, Section 52

NORP: J.1, Hindu, Mandamus

ORG: Managing Partner of M/s., Nagina, Distt, Uttar Pradesh, Railway Goods Shed, the U.P. Financial Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Rs. 3,28,717.97, Corporation, Deshbandhu Agarwal, Corporation, Court, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, State, Bharat, The State of Uttar Pradesh, the State Financial Corporation Act, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Board, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, the Public Sector Enterprise, the Public Sector, Erosion of Working Capital, Results, Government, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, State, Corporation, Corporation, Court, Government, State, Kernal, Justice, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Maitland, Equity, Trusteeship, Corporation, Corporation, Kerr on Receivers 17th Edition, Corporation, Fertiliser Corporation Kamgar Union, Ors, v. Union of India and Ors, Court, Authorities, Government, In Ram & Shyam Co., State, Haryana this Court, State, Sachidanand Pandey, Court, State, Kerala Financial Corporation, Court, State, Court, C.I.T., Court, Government, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation

PERSON: Shiva Rice Mill, Nos, Nos, Nos, Mahatma Gandhiji, Meerut, Malcolm S. Adiseshaiah, Kasturilal Laxmi, Issac, Issac, N. Swyanarayan Iyer's, Haji T.M. Hassan, Lakshmanasami Gounder v., Selvamani, J., Nos

CARDINAL: two, 208, 220/2, 8, 208, 2,700, one, 4,28,000, eleven, 220, two, 65,000, 50,000, 6, 1,93,670, 3,70,660, 3,835, 65,000, 5,03,165, 221, 220, 219, 219, 221, 220, two, 2,00,000, 2,55,000, 63,750, half, 220, 40,000, 92, millions, 38, 39, 220, two, 5,00,000, five, two, fifty thousands, four, 3,78,660, 74,000, 3,29,000, 5,00,000, 220, one, transferee, 6, 2,55,000, One, half, 42, 43, 1980]3SCR1338, One, two, one, 275, one, 208, 919, 1981)ILLJ193SC, 1987]2SCR223, One, 1988]1SCR1079, 1992)1SCC91, one, 2, 2,55,000, 5, 3, 5, 220/2, One, one, five, 220, 219, 221

DATE: 18, 1979, 1980, annual, 1991, December, 1981, December 22, 1983, February 10, 1986, March 31, 1986, September, 1985, January 13, 1987, March 25, 1987, four years, yearly, February 9, 1990, February 10, 1986, October 31, 1951, 20 years, 1986, 1980, 1986, year, year, annual, 45, 46, 1987, '17, 39, nepotism.20, day, daily, four years of half, four weeks, six months'

GPE: Bishwas, Highway, Swaraj, India, States, Trusts, Halsbury, Sindri

FAC: the Railway Station

ORDINAL: third, firstly, secondly, First, Second, first, third, third, 3rd, third, third, third, third, third, first

PERCENT: 25%, 18%, 25%

TIME: the idle hours

WORK_OF_ART: Economist, 'The Why, Problem of Loss-Making Units, 4th Edition, Vol

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //