Commissioner of Income-tax West Bengal and anr. Vs. Anil Kumar Roy Chowdhury and anr.

Decided On : Mar-30-1967

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: section 64(2, section 5(7, section 5(5, section 5(7, section 66, section 64(2, section 31, section 34, Section 5(7, section 64(2, section 64(2

ORG: the High Court of Judicature, the High Court, the High Court, Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Appellate, District VI, Ballygunge Circular Road,, Calcutta, the Appellate Tribunal, the Income Tax Officer, District VI, Calcutta, the Appellate Tribunal, The Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Income Tax Officer, District VI, Calcutta, the Appellate Tribunal, The Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Income Tax Officer, District VI, Calcutta, the Appellate Tribunal, The Appellate Tribunal, Ballygunge Circular Road,, District VI, District VI, District VI, the Appellate Tribunal, the Commissioner of Income-tax or, the Board of Revenue, District VI, District VI, Calcutta, the High Court, the High Court, District VI, District VI, the Board of Revenue, the Board of Revenue, the Board of Revenue, Appellate, Ballygunge Circular Road, the Income- tax Officer, District VI, the Ballygunge Circular Road, District VI, District VI, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Board of Revenue, District VI, District VI, the Ballygunge Circular Road, Appellate, the Appellate Tribunal, Appellate, Appellate, Income Tax Officer, Income Tax, the Commissioner of Income Tax, the Calcutta High Court, Income Tax, District VI, Ballygunge Circular Road,, District VI, the Income- tax Officer of the area, the High Court, the Central Board of Revenue, the Board of Revenue, the Punjab High Court, The High Court, S. Sarkar & Co., the Punjab High Court, the High Court, the Calcutta High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court

NORP: Indian, Hindu, Indian

DATE: 1922, 1959, the assessment year 1947-48, February 12, 1952, 1922, February 7, 1956, 1,41,851, 1954, 25, 1954, sixty days, 1954, '64, the assessment year 1944-45, '12

CARDINAL: 79, 2, 1,41,851, 29B, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 24, 29, 3, 4., 5, 29B, 6, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8., One, 9, 29B, 64(1, 2, 1, 2, 10, 11, one, one, 13, 14, one, 15

LOC: East Pakistan

PRODUCT: Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta

PERSON: Beadon Row, Calcutta v. S. Sarkar and Co., C. J., Lahore, R. B. L. Benarsi Das v. Commissioner of Income-tax, R. B. L. Benarsi Das v. Commissioner of Income-tax

GPE: West Bengal, West Bengal, Commr, West Bengal, Sardar, Singh v., Delhi, India

WORK_OF_ART: The Punjab High Court