Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Sahoo Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Decided On : Feb-16-1965

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: the Indian Penal Code, the Indian Penal Code, the Evidence Act, IndAp 66, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act

PERSON: Subba Rao, Kirpa Shanker, Mohammed Abdullah, Kirpa Shanker, Gonda, Gonda, Mohammed Abdullah, Kirpa Shanker, R. L.R., Taylor, Phipson, Taylor, 11th Edn, Vol, Phipson, S.C.R.

NORP: J.1

GPE: Pachperwa, the District of, Gonda, Lucknow, Sahoo, Sunderpatti, Sahoo, Pakala, Bhogilal

CARDINAL: two, one, one, 2, 3., 1, 2, 3, 4, 17, 5, 6, 9, 15, 4, 5, 24 to 30, 66, 6, 17 to 30, 596, 7, 454, 8, 262, 9, 1, 310, 157, 10, 11, 12, 11, 15, 13, 14

ORG: Badri, Badri, Badri, Sunderpatti, Sunderpatti, the Court of Sessions, the High Court at Allahabad, the High Court, Sunderpatti, The Judicial Committee, W.M. Best, 7th Edn, Court, Court, the High Court, Sunderpatti, the High Court

DATE: years ago, August 12, 1963, about 8 years, August 13, 1963, that day, August 26, 1963, 11, 13, that day, daily, 12th Edn., 1959, 13, daily

LOC: Sunderpatti

ORDINAL: second, second, first, third

TIME: the morning, 5.25 p.m., 3 p.m. Sahoo, the fateful night 3, the early morning of next day, about 6 a.m., 6 O'clock in the morning

FAC: the Sadar Hospital

PRODUCT: P.W. 17, Supp

WORK_OF_ART: A Treatise on the Law of Evidence', 'The Principles of the Law of Evidence'

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //