Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Stridewell Leathers (P) Ltd. and Others Vs. Bhankerpur Simbhaoli Beverages (P) Ltd.

Decided On : Oct-05-1993

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: the Companies Act, Section 10F, the Companies Act, Section 10F, Section 10F of the Companies Act, Section 10F, Section 10(1)(a, Section 10, Section 10F, the Companies Act, Section 10F, Section 10E, Section 10F, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, the Company Law, Section 10E nor Section 10F, Section 10(1, the Companies Act, Section 10, the Constitution of, Section 195, Section 193, the Indian Penal Code, Section 196, the Company Law Board.10F., Section 10F, Section 2(11, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10, Section 2(11, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10F, Section 10E(6, Section 10F, Section 10F, Section 153(7, the Indian Companies Act, Section 202, the Indian Companies Act, Section 10F, the Companies Act, Article 226, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 10F, Article 226, Section 10F of the Companies Act, Article 226, Constitution, Section 10F, Section 54, the Companies Act, Section 10F, the Companies Act, Section 54, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, Section 10F, Section 10F, the Companies Act, Section 10F, Section 2(11

ORG: the High Court', the High Court, the Company Law Board, the High Court, the High Court, the Company Law Board, Stridewell Leathers Private Ltd., the Company Law Board, Shoe Specialities Pvt, the Company Law Board, the Company Law Board, Shri F.S. Nariman, the High Court', the High Court, the Delhi High Court, the High Court, the Company Law Board, the High Court', the High Courts, the Company Law Board, the Company Law Board, High Courts, the Company Law Board, the High Court, the Company Law Board, the Delhi High Court, the Company Law Board, High Court, Company Law Board, the Central Government, the High Court, the Company law Board, the Company Law Board, the High Courts, the High Court, the High Court, High Courts, the Company Law Board, High Court, the Company Law Board, the High Court', the Company Law Board, the Company Law Board, the High Court', Court, Court, Court, Court, The High Court, District Court, District Courts, High Court, the District Court, The Central Government, District Court, Court, Sections 237, Constitution of Board, the Companies (Amendment) Act, Central Government, Board, the Board of company Law Administration.(1A, The Company Law Board, the Central Government, the Central Government, The Company Law Board, Central Government, the Central Government, the Company Law Board, the Companies (Amendment) Act, the Company Law Board, the Company Law Board, the Central Government, the Company Law Board, Board, Board, Bench, Court, CPC, CrPC, Bench, Company Law, the Company Law Board, the Company Law Board, the High Court, the Company Law Board, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the High Court', Court, the High Court', the District Court', the High Court', the High Court', Court, the High Court', Court, Court, the High Court, the District Court, Court, the High Court', Court, High Court, High Court, the Company Law Board, High Court, the Company Law Board, High Court, the Company Law Board, the Company Law Board, the Company Law Board, the Company Law Board Regulations, the High Court', the Delhi High Court, the Company Law Board, Bench, the High Court, the Company Law Board, the Company Law Board, the Company Law Board, the Company Law Board, the High Court, High Court, the Company Law Board's, Arjun Prasad v., the High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court under Clause 10, the Supreme Court, Ors, the High Court, Parliament, the High Court, the High Court, the Company Law Board, Letters, the High Courts, the Company Law Board, the High Court, The High Court, Parliament, the High Court, the Company Law Board, the Delhi High Court, the High Courts, the Central Government, the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, the High Court, the Appellate Board, Sections 2(11, the Lahore High Court, the High Courts, the High Court', the Company Law Board, the Company Law Board, the Delhi High Court, The Delhi High Court

DATE: 1956, 1988, 1956, Section 10F, 1988, the six months, 1988, 1988, three years, 1988, 1908, 1973, 45 of 1860, sixty days, sixty days, Section 10E, 1991, 1913, 1913, 1956, 1973, Section 10F, 10(1)(a, 1956

CARDINAL: 31.5.1991, 28.5.1993, 1, 793, 29.7.1993, 29.7.1993, two, 31.5.1991, 398, one, 398, 1, 2, 391, 394, 395, 397, 407, 425, 560, 1, exceeding(nine, One, 31-5-1991.(4B, 4B, 5, 2, 228, 4C, 1, 1, more than one, 398, 1962]2SCR402, 1964]1SCR717

LOC: Madras, Madras

GPE: Delhi, Delhi, Counsel, Clause, Delhi, Delhi

PERSON: Shri Nariman, Shri A.K. Sen, Bhushan, Shri Sen, Shri Shanti Bhushan, XXX XXX(ii, Courts.10, Gazette, Law Administration10F., Gazette, Gazette, Gazette, Benches, Bench, Principal, Shantilal Shankarlal Shah, Shankarlal Aggarwal, Shankarlal Poddar, Shri Shanti Bhushan

PRODUCT: Sections 397, Bench

ORDINAL: first, first

TIME: under this Act, under this Act

EVENT: Clause 11

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //