Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Jyoti Sarup and anr. Vs. Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh

Decided On : Sep-05-1960

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 5 of the Act, section 6, section 2, section 6, section 6, section 6, section 6, article 133, Constitution, article 32 of the Constitution, section 6, section 6, section 6, section 6, section 6, section 6, section 15, section 15, section 15, section 13, section 6, Section 13, section 2, section 6, section 6, article 14, Constitution

PERSON: S.K. Das, B. V. Bhadkamkar, H. C. Bhari, Ram Krishna Dalmia v., Shri S.R., Tenolkar Tendolkar

NORP: J.1, Indian, Indian

CARDINAL: two, 2, two, two, one, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 2, 2, two, 1, 2, 2, 1, two, 1, two, 4., two, 2, two, 5, 1, two, two, 6, two, 1, 1, two, 1, two, 1, one, two, 4, 4, 4, 8, 1, one, 1, 9, 10, 1, two, one, two, 11, 12, four, only one, only one, two, 13

GPE: Pilibhit, Matajog Dobey

ORG: the U. P. Agricultural Income-tax Act, the Board of Revenue, the Board of Revenue, the Board of Revenue, the Board of Revenue, The Board of Revenue, the High Court of Allahabad, the Board of Revenue, the Collector of Pilibhit, the Board of Revenue, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the U. P. Agricultural Income-tax (Amendment) Act, the High Court, The High Court, the Board of Revenue, The High Court, the Board of Revenue, the High Court, the Board of Revenue, the Board of Revenue, the Board of Revenue, Board, Board, Board, The High Court, Board, Board, the Board of Revenue, Board, Board, Board, the Board of Revenue

DATE: 1949, '6, years, years 1948-49, 1949-50, the assessment year 1950-51, the year 1951-52, September 9, 1952, the year 1952-53, the year 1952-1953, 1953, 1953, each assessment year, July 1, 1953, the year 1952-1953, the year, the end of June, 1952-53, 1953, one year, 1922, each year, the previous year, one year, the year, the assessment year, 11, 1922, 11, previous year

MONEY: 7 1/2 per cent

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //