Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Life Insurance Corporation of India and Union of India and Another Vs. Prof. Manubhai D. Shah
and
Cinemart Foundation

Decided On : Jul-22-1992

Court : Supreme Court of India

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: Article 19(1)(a, Constitution, Article 136 of the Constitution, Constitution, Article 12 of the Constitution and the in-house, Article 19(1)(a, Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution as, Article 19(1)(a, Constitution, Article 19(1)(a, Constitution, Article 19(2, Constitution, Article 19(1)(a, Constitution, Article 19(2, Article 19(1)(a, Constitution, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19(1)(a, Constitution, the Fundamental Rights, Article 19(2, the First Amendment, the First Amendment, the First Amendment, Constitution, the Indian Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, a Bill of Rights in the Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Article 19(2, Constitution, Article 19(2, Constitution, Article 19(2, Article 19(2, Article 19(1)(a, Article 19(2, Article 19(1)(a).9, Article 19(1)(a, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 136 of the Constitution, Article 19(2, Article 19(1)(a, Article 19(1)(a, Article 19(1)(a, Article 19(1)(a, Article 19(2, Article 19(1)(a, Article 19(2, Article 19(2, Article 12 of the Constitution, the Cinematograph Act,, Article 19(1)(a, Article 19(2, Constitution, Section 5B of the Act, Article 19(2, Section 3 of the Act, Section 4, Section 5C, Constitution, Section 5D, Section 6, Section 9, Section 5D, Section 9, Section 5B, Section 5B, Section 9, Article 19(2, Article 19(1)(a, Article 19(2, the First Amendment, Article 19(1)(a, Article 19(2, Constitution, Constitution, the Constitution and Section 5B of the Act, Article 19(1)(a, Article 19(2, Section 58 of the Act, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 19(2, Article 19(1)(a, Constitution, Article 19(2, Section 5B of the Act, Article 19(1)(a

CARDINAL: 339, 1991.2, two, two, 1254/80, two, 1, 2, 212, 1, 341, 343, 236, 495, 1986]159ITR856(SC, 316, 1989]2SCR204, 10, one, two, 1975)ILLJ399SC, one, 2, five, six, three, 1), 5, 2, two, 2, two, 2, Two, 403, 713, 1971]2SCR446, four, four, Two

ORG: Court, the Gujarat High Court, the Consumer Education & Research, CERC, the Life Insurance Corporation, LIC, LIC, LIC, LIC, LIC, LIC, LIC, The High Court, Corporation, LIC, Corporation, LIC, State, the High Court, the High Court, LIC, LIC, The High Court, LIC, the Gujarat High Court, LIC, Information & Broadcasting, the Minister for Information & Broadcasting, the Film Selection Committee of Doordarshan, Screening Committee, The Ministry of Information & Broadcasting, the Screening Committee, The Screening Committee, Bhopal Disaster, The High Court, Doordarshan, the High Court, The People of India, State, State, the American Courts, U.S. 494, Wilson, Court, Mutual Film Corporation v. Industrial Commission, U.S. 230, Court, the American Supreme Court, the Indian Courts, Fundamental Rights, Bar, Union of India, Sakal Papers Pvt. Ltd., Court, Press, Indian Express Newspapers, Ors, v. Union of India and Ors, Court, Press, Court, Odyssey Communications Pvt, The High Court, Court, Court, Doordarshan, Doordarshan, Court, U, Court, the U.S. First Amendment, Court, Intolerance, Court, LIC, LIC, The High Court, the High Court, Corporation, the High Court, the High Court, LIC, LIC, LIC, LIC, LIC, LIC, State, Ors, the Life Insurance Corporation Act, Life Insurance, LIC, LIC, LIC, LIC, LIC, LIC, LIC, State, LIC, LIC, LIC, LIC, the High Court, LIC, LIC, State, LIC, Court, the High Court's, LIC, LIC, LIC, LIC, Court, LIC, the High Court, LIC, Doordarshan, the High Court, Doordarshan, the Film Selection Committee of Doordarshan, U, the Central Board of Film Certification under Section 5A, the High Court, the High Court, Additional Solicitor General, the High Court, the Central Government, Board, Board, an Examining Committee, Revising Committee, the Examining Committee, Board, Section 4A, the Examining Committee, the Examining Committee, the Revising Committee, Board, U, State, the Central Government, Board, the Central Government, the Central Government, State, the Central Government, the Board of Film Certification, State, the Board of Film Certification, the Central Government, Doordarshan, Doordarshan Kendra, the Central Government, the Board of Film Certification, the High Court, the State Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the High Court, New York Times Company, Board of Film Censors, Court, The Union of India, The Board of Film Censors, U, Board, U, Frenchman, Ramesh v. The Union of India, the Bombay High Court, Court, Hidayatullah, inter alia, the Bombay High Court, Court, the U.S. First Amendment, the U.S. First Amendment, State, Court, U, the State Government, State, State, U, Additional Solicitor General, Doordarshan, State

DATE: 1979, 17th June, 1980, 10th July, 1978, daily, 10th July, 1978, 1987, 1989, 1948, 1950, today, 53, tendencies.11, 10th July, 1978, November, 1978, December, 1978, December 1978, 1956, December 1978, annual, 1978, such long years, 1987, 1952, two months, 7th January, 1978, 11th August, 1989, 16th October, 1984, 16th October, 1984, the past few years, 19(1)(a, today

PERSON: Ahmedabad, N.C. Krishnan, Krishnan, Articles 14, Krishnan, Yogakshema, Krishnan, Shri Tapari Bose, Beyond Genocide', Beyond Genocide', Speech, Frankfurter observed:.The, Joseph Burstyn Inc., Sakal Papers, Tappar v. The State of Madras, Lokvidayan Sanghatana, P. Jagjivan Ram, Curt, Court, N.C. Krishnan, Krishnan, Yogakshema, Sukhdev Singh, Bhagatram Sardar, Krishnan, Krishnan, Krishnan, Krishnan, Krishnan, Beyond Genocide', Tulsi, K.A. Abbas, Hidayatullah, K.A. Abbas, Abbas, Abbas, Tamas, Bhisma Sahni, K.A. Abbas

NORP: Hindu, Dennis, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Constitutionality

PRODUCT: the 'Yogakshema', Articles 21 and 25

ORDINAL: first, second, First, first, first, 6th, 4th

FAC: the Golden Lotus, the Golden Lotus, the Golden Lotus

GPE: Doordarshan, Doordarshan, Doordarshan, Doordarshan, Doordarshan, Doordarshan, Doordarshan, Doordarshan, Doordarshan, India, U.S., Ohio, the People of India, India, India, Section Rangarajan v., India, Bhopal, India, India, Cinematograph, India, Doordarshan, Doordarshan, Doordarshan, Counsel, Doordarshan, Doordarshan, Doordarshan, Doordarshan, Doordarshan, United Stales, the United States, U.S., Bombay, India, Lahore, India, Bhopal, Bhopal, Doordarshan

WORK_OF_ART: Civil Writ No

EVENT: the Preamble of the Constitution

MONEY: 1962]3SCR842 .8

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //