Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

L.C. Hanumanthappa (Since Dead)represented by His Lrs. Vs. H.B.Shivakumar

Decided On : Aug-26-2015

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 22, the Limitation Act, Article 58 of the Limitation Act, Article 58 of the Limitation Act, Article 58 of the Schedule, Article 120 of the Schedule to the Limitation Act, Article 120 of the 1908 Act, Article 120 of the 1908 Act, Article 58, Article 120 of the 1908 Act, Article 120 of the [, Article 58 of the 1963 Act, Article 120 of the 1908 Act, Order VI Rule 17, Article 54 of the Schedule, the Limitation Act, Plaintiff 1, Article 60 of the Limitation Act, Order VI Rule 17, Order VI Rule 17, Article 54 of the Limitation Act, Article 54, Article 54 of the Limitation Act

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, S.L.P., L.C. HANUMANTHAPPA, DEAD, the City Civil Court, the City Civil Court, Bangalore, O.S. No.1386 of, No.13, Plaintiff, No.13, Corporation No.12/2, No.14, Bangalore City Corporation, O.S. No.1386 of, the Court of Additional City Civil Judge, the High Court, The High Court, Court, No.415/99, the Trial Court, Trial Court, the Trial Court, O.S. 1386/90, O.S. No.1386 of, Plaintiff, Schedule Property, Plaintiff, the City Civil Court, the High Court, The High Court, Khatri Hotels Private Limited & Anr, v. Union of India & Anr, SCC126 this Court, First Division-Suits Description, the Judicial Committee, IA, ILR, andGobinda, Rukhmabai, AIR, the Bombay High Court, Court, the Privy Council, L.J.Leach & Co. Ltd., Jardine Skinner & Co., the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, K. Raheja Constructions Ltd. & Anr, Alliance Ministries & Ors, Supp, Court, Court, Vishwambhar & Ors, Laxminarayan (Dead, LRs & Anr, Court, the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, Laxmibai, Vishwambhar, Laxmibai, Laxmibai, Anr v. Mamtha Shenoy, L.J.Leach & Co. Ltd., Court, the High Court, CPC, Court, Court, Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, Khatri Hotels Private Limited, the High Court, J.(A.K. Sikri

GPE: No.15513, H.B., O.S., property.6, O.S., Karnataka, O.S., O.S., O.S., O.S., O.S., Shivakumar, O.S., O.S., R.F.A., Bolo, Annamalai, Rukhmabai, Pirgonda, Charan, Pirgonda, Vishwambhar, Pirgonda, Vishwambhar, New Delhi

DATE: 2015, 9th March, 1990, 1990, two days, a few days, 1990, about 15 days, 1990, 16th May, 1990, several years, 16th May, 1990, 1990, 10th March, 1999, 1990, 1990, 28th March, 2002, R.F.A. No.415 of 1999, R.F.A. No.456 of 1999, 6) months, to-day, 1st April, 2002, 1990, 1st August, 2002, 16th April, 2009, 1990, 1st August, 2002, 2009, 5th March, 2015, 16th May, 1990, three years, 16th May, 1990, 1990, 1963, 28th March, 2002, 9th March, 1990, 16th April, 2009, three years, 28th March, 2002, 2011, 58, 1908, no period Six years, six years, three years, 1929-30, 1930, 1930-31, 1960, 1960, the day, 16th May, 1990, the year 1900, 1957, Twenty years later, 47, 1957, 1957, Seven years, the period of seven years, three years, 1963, 2001, Section 8(2, 1956, 1975, 20-7-1978, December 1985, three years, December 1985, 2001, 2002, 11 years, 2001, almost 11 years, about 11 years, 9, 10, 2010, 11th February, 1991, 16th December, 2002, three years, 1976, about 11 years, 12 years, 2001, 24, 25, 2013, 1913, 16th May, 1990, 28th March, 2002, 16th May, 1990, 16th May, 1993, August 26, 2015

PERSON: Appellant(s, JUDGMENT R.F. Nariman, L.C. Hanumanthappa, H.B. Shivakumar, O.S. No.1386, Bangalore, L.C. Ramaiah, Shri Hanumanthappa, No.12, H. Venkataramanappa, Sri Ahmadullah, C.T.S. No.1157, No.13, Bangalore, O.S. No.1386, Hanumathappa, Schedule Property, Schedule, Bangalore, O.S. No.1386, Hanumanthappa, limitation.10, O.S. No.1386, Shri Rohatgi, Schedule, Muthukaruppan Chettiar, Narayan Singh, Sham Lal Singh, IA125, Lala Laxminarayan, Bench, Kisandas Rupchand, Rachappa Vithoba, Bench, Hongonda Patil v., Shidgonda Patil, Amir Khan, Hongonda Patil, Plaintiff 2 Digamber, Digamber, Digamber, Digamber, Siddalingamma, Hongonda Patil, Anr, Siddalingamma, Van Vibhag Karamchari Griha Nirman Sahkari Sanstha Maryadit, Ramesh Chander and Ors, Anr, Amrik Singh, J.(R.F. Nariman

CARDINAL: one, one, one, 4, document.5, one, one, 2, 3, 13, about 6-6-1989, 5, 10, two, two, six, 1386/90, 7, 5A, 5A., 8, 2, 9, 3, 120, two, 57, 8, 645, 58, 2, three, 2, 349, 33, 25, 13, 644, two, 655].16, three, 603, 604.17, 18, 450, 451.19, 415].20, 3, 6, 14-11-1967, 24, 3, 2, 5, 30-11-1980, one, one, 9, 8, two, 7, 17, 14, 3-2-1991, 6, 168-69, 9, 9, two, 2

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, First, Secondly, first

EVENT: O.S. 1386/90, Three Years

FAC: 05/05/1956

WORK_OF_ART: Suits Relating To Declarations *, SCC576 this Court

QUANTITY: 8 SCC561

PRODUCT: Respondent 2

LOC: Single Judge

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //