Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ld. andor Vs. M/S Adarsh Textiles and Anr

Decided On : Dec-03-2014

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 108, the Electricity Act, Section 65, the Electricity Act, Section 65 of Electricity Act, the Division Bench, Section 5, the Reforms Act, Section 12, the Reforms Act, The Electricity Act, Section 62, Section 65, the Electricity Act, Section 108 of the Act of, the Electricity Act, Section 62, Section 65, section 62, section 108, Section 108, Section 65, Section 62, Section 65, Section 108, Section 12 of Reforms Act

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, the Government of Uttar Pradesh, the U.P. Electricity Regulatory Commission, Commission, HV-2, SLP, Commission, HP, HP, The State Government, U.P. Power Corporation Ltd., Commission, Commission, State, U.P., State Government, Commission, Government, the U.P. Power Corporation Limited, Commission, the State Government, Government, Commission, the State Government, the State Government, The State Government, Commission, Commission, LMV-6, Commission, Government, the Electricity Regulatory Commission, Commission, Commission, Government of, U.P., U.P. State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Commission, the State Government, The U.P. Government, HV-2, U.P., Commission, Commission, Energy, Government of U.P., Government, LMV-6, U.P. Power Corporation Ltd., LMV-6, the Government of U.P., U.P. Power Corporation Ltd., M/s Hiltrex Industrial Fabrics Pvt. Ltd., W.P. No.2204, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Government, U.P. Electricity Regulatory Commission, HV-2, the Lucknow Bench, HV-2, HV-2, the High Court of Allahabad, Another v. Purvanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd., CMWP No.8765, M/s. Adarsh Textiles v. Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. & Ors, M/s Amit Textiles v. Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd.17, M/s. Vikas Textile Company, U.P., M/s Maa Vind Vasini Industries, the High Court, Corporation, Government, Vikas Textile, SLP, Electricity Distribution Division - I, the State Government, The State Government, the State Government, Commission, HV-2, the State Government, Corporation, Commission, HV-2, the State Government, Commission, State, Commission, the High Court of Allahabad, U.P., Uttar Pradesh State Electricity Board, The Uttar Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, the State Government, the State Government, The State Government, Commission, the State Government, the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, The State Government, Commission, the State Government, Commission, Commission, Parliament, Commission, the State Government, the State Commission, the State Government, Commission, the State Government, Appropriate Commission, the Appropriate Commission, the Appropriate Commission, The Appropriate Commission, Appropriate Commission, the State Government, the State Commission, the State Government, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Government, the State Government, State Commission, Commission, the State Commission, the State Government, State Government, the State Commission, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, Commission, Sections 65, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, Commission, LMV-6, Commission, the State Government, Commission, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, Court, Ess Dee Carpet Enterprises v. Union of India, The State Government, HV-2, Commission, the State Government, the State Government, Commission, Commission, the State Government, Commission, State, State, Court, Gujarat State Financial Corporation, M/s. Lotus Hotels Pvt. Ltd., Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd., State of U.P. & Ors, the State Government, The State Government, Commission, Commission, Corporation, the State Government, Commission, the State Government, the Commission/Corporation, State, HV-2, Commission, Corporation, State, the High Court of Allahabad, Vikas Textiles', SLP

GPE: CIVIL, also.10, Varanasi Region, Varanasi, Sahjani, Magarwara, District Unnao, Lucknow, New Delhi

PERSON: JUDGMENT Arun Mishra, LMV-6, LMV-6, LMV-6, LMV-6, Lucknow Bench, Gorakhpur, CMWP No.8763, Hathras, LMV-6, Bench, Rs.65/-, Singh Khehar, J.(Arun Mishra

NORP: J.1, U.P.

DATE: 14.6.2006, 2008, the year 2004-2005, 2008, two half, 11.7.2006, 2003, 2004-2005, 2004-2005, monthly, monthly, 11.7.2006, 11.7.2006, 14th/15th September, 2006, 2003, 14.6.2006, 18.10.2006, 14.6.2006, 2007, 14.6.2006, 2006- 2007, 2007, 12.12.2007, 2008, 2007, 11.7.2007, 14.6.2006, 2009, 14.6.2006, April 2007 to December 2007, 23.9.2009, 14.6.2006, the previous years, 14/15th September, 2006, 14.6.2006, 1999, 1999, 1999, 2003, 2003, 2003, 62, 65, 2003, one year, any financial year, 2003, 1999, 2003, 14.6.2006, 24.2.2007, 1.5.2007, 2003, 1999, 14.6.2006, 14.6.2006, 1990, 11.7.2006, 1983, 1979, 14.6.2006, April, 2007 to, 2007, 9869/2008, 29320/2010, 29324/2010, December 3, 2014

LOC: LMV-2, LMV-2, LMV-2, LMV-2, LMV-2, LMV-2

CARDINAL: 6, up to 100, 100, more than 100, 2.5, 14.6.2006, 3.7.2006, 14.6.2006.6, one, 14, 6.10.2006, 24.2.2007, 2, 1.5.2007, One, 10.10.2007, 13.8.2009, 31.3.2007.18, 13.8.2009, HV-2, 24.2.2007, 14.1.2000, 1948.22, 12, 1, 2)(a, 108, 1, two, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 1, 2, HV-2, 14, HV-2, 0.5, 1, 75, 1, 14, 14, HV-2, 3, 2, one

WORK_OF_ART: the Lucknow Bench, the Lucknow Bench

MONEY: 108 of Act

QUANTITY: 60 inches, more than 60 inches

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //