Ram Nath Jindal and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Decided On : Jul-19-2001

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Section 41(2, Section 32 of the Act, Circular No, Section 16, the Finance Act, Explanation 5, Section 32(1)(ii, a Truck No, Section 143(1

PERSON: Jawahar Lal Gupta, Shri Ram Nath Jindal, Ram Nath Jindal, Ajay Mittal, R.P. Sawhney, Paras, Mahendra Mills, Sawhney

CARDINAL: two, two, two, 345, 2, 345, 2, one, 3, 345, 62,000, 64,300, 345, 43,400, 62,000, 18,600, 20,900, 64,300, 43,400, 4, 5, 29, 2, 3, 3, 6, 7, 2000, 243, 56, 34, 37, 8, 9, 11-12, 345, 62,000, 10, 11, 12, 13

DATE: the relevant years, '1, years 1980-81, 1981-82, these two years, the assessment year 1978-79, years 1979-80, 1981-82, the relevant years, a period of, three years, today, August 31, 1965, the preceding year, the assessment year, the past years, any past year, 2001, April 1, 2002, the assessment year 1978-79, the assessment year 1978-79, the assessment year 1979-80, the assessment year 1981-82, the relevant years, the relevant years, the relevant years

ORG: the Tribunal for the opinion, Department, Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, Department, Department, the High Court, Tribunal, Legislature, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, The Board, Bench, Beco Engineering Co. Ltd., CIT, CIT, Friends Corporation, the Supreme Court, CIT, Explanation, Assessing, Tribunal, the High Court

MONEY: 30 per cent, 30 per cent

WORK_OF_ART: Truck No