Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Anchor Line Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Decided On : Feb-28-1989

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

LAW: Section 44-B, Section 44B., Section 72, Section 72.1, Chapter IV, Section 5, Section 2(24, Section 44B.Section, Section 2(24)(i, Section 448, Section 4, Section 2(24, Section 44B, Section 44B, Chapter IV-D

CARDINAL: 1, two, 84.2, 10, 10-7-1987.3, 26, CIT[1986, 26, 1952, 22, 65, 2, 1-4-1976, 1, 2, 2, 1, 28 to 43, 4, 70 to 80

ORG: C.I.T., Tribunal, Anchor Line Ltd., ITO, ITA Nos, C.I.T., Tribunal, Tribunal, Tino Kauin Kaisha Ltd., ITO, Universal Cargo Carriers Inc., Tribunal, the Calcutta High Court, Tribunal, the Bombay High Court, Ambika Silk Mills Co. Ltd., CIT, Tribunal, High Court, Sections 28

GPE: A.Ys, India, India, India, Sections

DATE: 1982-83, 1983, 1984, 2679, 2680, 2696, the earlier years, these two years, 1988, 8 years, 58, earlier years, 8 years, 1961, 1961, 1975, seven and a half

ORDINAL: first

PERSON: Chapter IV-D

EVENT: Sections 28 to 43A, Sections 28 to 43, Sections 28 to 43A

LANGUAGE: Chapters

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //