Raj Bala Vs. Bijender

Decided On : Mar-27-2001

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, Order 41 Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure

ORG: V.S. Aggarwal, Smt, Tribunal, Smt, Virender Kumar s, Virender Kumar, the Modern Food Industries, Bahadurgarh, National Insurance Company, Tribunal, Tribunal, Mandroop PW3, Tata, Court, Tribunal, Ihe Supreme Court, The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., AIR 2001, Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, -'No Fault Liability', the Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, S. Kaushnuma Begam's, S. Kaushnuma Begam's, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, the Insurance Company

NORP: J.1

PERSON: Raj Bala, Rohtak, Bijender, Sanjay Singh, Dharam Pal, Raj Bala, Baldev Singh, Bijender, Rohtak, Rohtak, Rohtak, Rohtak, Rohtak, Mahender Singh PW2, Rohtak, Mandroop Singh, Mandroop Singh, S. Kaushnuma Begum, Rylands v. Fletcher, voienti non-fit, Blackburn, J., Rylands, lacunas

WORK_OF_ART: the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal

CARDINAL: 14.1.2000, about 6, 8, 1 to 3, 1 to 3, 6, 1, 1, 1 to 3, 4, 1, four, 1, 1, 485, 1, 2, 4, 6, two, two, 1., 1, 1

PERCENT: 11%

DATE: 1988, 28.9.1998, 28.9.1998, the fateful day, 1861-73, this regard.11, the day

GPE: Bahadurgarh, Rohtak, Bahadurgarh, India, Bahadurgarh, Delhi, Rajasthan, Rajasthan, interfere.10

ORDINAL: first, firstly

QUANTITY: 3) Act