Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ram Kishan Vs. State of Haryana

Decided On : Sep-24-2003

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Section 18, Section 4, Section 4 of the Act, Section 23 of the Act, Section 28

PERSON: Hemant Gupta, Gurgaon, Rawason Tehsil Nuh, District Gurgaon, Prithvi Raj Taneja, Lrs, Anr, Kalidas Chakraborty, Harpartap Rai Puri v. State of Punjab, Amir Chand PW1, 600/- permarla

NORP: J.1

DATE: 1894, 21.10.1982, 1977(1, 14.2.1983, 2003(3

CARDINAL: 10, 6, 28.7.1982, 1/3rd, 1/3rd, 1/3rd, 684, one, 231, 249, 1/3rd, 2/3rd, one, 136, 1/3rd, 1/3rd, 1/3rd

ORG: The Land Acquisition Collector, The State of Madhya Pradesh, Calcutta Metropolitan Development Authority State of W.B., Dominion Land and Industries Ltd., Supreme Court, Court, Court, Supreme Court, Supreme Court

QUANTITY: 10,000/- per acre, 600/-

TIME: 4500/-wherein 5

GPE: Gurgaon, S.C.C.

MONEY: 30per cent

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //