Semantic Analysis by spaCy
S.U. Pumps (P.) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer
Decided On : Jan-14-1988
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Indore
LAW: Section 40(a)(i, Section 40(a)(i, Section 40(a)(i, Chapter XVII-B, Chapter XVII-B of the Act, Section 163, Section 40(a)(i, Section 40(a)(i, Chapter XVII-B of the Income-tax Act, Section 40(a)(i, Chapter XVII-B of the Income-tax Act, Section 194A(1, Section 195(1, Section 194A(1, Section 195(1, Section 195(1, Section 195(1, Section 195(1, Section 194A(1, Section 195(1, Section 195(1, Section 195(1, Section 12(2)(iii, Section 24(12, Section 24(4, Section 18(3A, Section 24(12, Section 18(7, Section 40(a)(i
CARDINAL: 1, two, 7,500, 9,000, 50,000, one, 7,500, 9,000, 40(a)(i, 194A(1, 195(1, 40, 102, 196, 50, 111, two, 194A(1, 195(1, 194A(1, 1954, 25, 258, 125, 525, 530
DATE: 1981-82, 1982-83, 1981-82, 1982-83, 1-12-1982, 4-12-1982, 30 to 39, the 1st day of April, 1938, 1-12-1982, 1976, 1963, 1922, 1980
PERSON: Shri Karnail Singh, Shri Karnail, profession',-, Karnail Singh, Shri Karnail Singh
ORG: ITO, CIT, Kerala High Court, CIT v. Lakshmi Lines Ltd., the Calcutta High Court, Jalan &, Sons (P.) Ltd., CIT, HUF, the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, Legislature, Legislature, Bench, Hyderabad High Court, Nagaria Oil Mills, ITR, Lordships, the Hyderabad Income-tax Act, the Hyderabad Income-tax Act, the Hyderabad Income-tax Act, the Hyderabad Income-tax Act, the Supreme Court, CIT v. Toshoku Ltd., ITR, the Supreme Court
GPE: Act.3, India, Sections, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, D.R., India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India
ORDINAL: second
NORP: Hindu, Indian, C1, Indian, Indian