Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. B. Rai

Decided On : Aug-19-2003

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: section 144A, section 34, section 34, section 34, article 226 of the Constitution of India

PERSON: V.K. Bali, Amritsar Bench, Jalandhar, Annamma Alexander, AR, Chettiar, Chiranji Lal Multani, Shamlal Narula, Lal Multani, Shamlal Narula's, Lal Multani, Mal Rai Babadur, Shamlal Narula's, Lal Multani, Mal Rai Babadur, Shamlal Manila's

NORP: J.1, Punjab

ORG: Appellate Tribunal, Haryana High Court, CIT, the Supreme Court, CIT, Tribunal, Tribunal, CIT, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, Department

MONEY: 256(1, 12 per cent, 12 per cent

DATE: 1961, 1,17,975, the assessment year, 1,17,975, 1961, 1,17,975, October 9, 1995, 1964]53ITR151(SC, 1964]53ITR151(SC, 1964]53ITR151(SC, 1964]53ITR151(SC

CARDINAL: 2, more than six, 1991]191ITR551(Ker, 1967]63ITR458(SC, 1967]63ITR458(SC, 1967]63ITR458(SC

GPE: RM, Chiranji, Chiranji, Ramanathan, Chiranji