Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Bakeman's Home Products

Decided On : Sep-19-2007

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Section 80J, the IT Act, Section 37(3A, Section 37(3D, Section 80J, the IT Act, Section 37(3A, Section 37(3D, Section 37(3A, Section 80J, Section 37, Section 37(3D, Section 80J, Section 80J, Section 80J(4, Section 80J, Section 80J, Section 80J, Section 80J, Section 80J, Section 80J, Section 80HH or Section 80HHA, Section 33B, Indian IT Act, Section 80J, Section 80J, Section 80J, Section 80J, Section 80J, Section 80J, Section 80J, Section 80J, Section 80J, Section 37(3A, Section 37(3D, Section 37(3D, Section 80J, Section 37(3D, Section 37(3A, Section 80J, Section 37(3D, Section 37(3D, Section 37(3A

PERSON: Rajesh Bindal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh, Neo Phaima, Addl, Delhi High Court, Pharmed, Kar, Counsel, Addl, CTT, Neo Pharma, A. Mukherjee's, goods.15, Neo Pharma

NORP: J.1

ORG: Court, ITC, Tribunal, ITA Nos, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, M/s Rieta Biscuit Co., M/s Rieta Biscuit Co., P&L, ITO, ITO, AO, Tribunal, Tribunal, CLT, P) Ltd., CTR, Calcutta High Court, P) Ltd., LTR, Griffon Laboratories, CIT, Orient Longman Ltd., CIT, LTR 477, Pharmed, ITO, Learned Counsel, Tribunal, Tribunal, M/s Rieta Biscuit Co., P) Ltd., Tribunal, CTT, Laxmi Metal Industries, CTR, CTT, Alcock Ashdown & Co. Ltd., CTR, SC, LTR 353, SC, CTT, Gopal Plastics, CIT, Shri Yamuna Mills Co. Ltd., CTT v. Caps & Caps, CIT, Century Enka Ltd., CIT, Century Enka Ltd., Bajaj Tempo Ltd., CIT, Lohia Machines Ltd., Anr, Union of India, CFT, Nippon Electronics, P) Ltd., CTR, FTR, Clauses (II, the Central Government, the Eleventh Schedule, India;(b, Tribunal, A. Mukherjee & Co., P) Ltd., LTR, Griffon Laboratories, CIT, Orient Longman Ltd., CFT, LTR 477, CLT, the Calcutta High Court, Court, Delhi High Court, Orient Longman Ltd.'s, Griffon Laboratories, P) Ltd.'s, M/s Rieta Biscuit Co., P) Ltd., M/s Rieta Biscuit Co., P) Ltd., M/s Rieta Biscuit Co., Tribunal, Tribunal, Learned Counsel, Tribunal, Tribunal, Act.22

CARDINAL: 60 and 61 of, 118, 119, 163, 164, 2, 2., 11,208, 11,208, two, 4, 28, 223, 137LTR 879, 113, 119, 1TR 145, 130, 146, 722, 236, 139, 224, 215, 215, 1989]179ITR235(MP, 1999]239ITR802(Cal, 1999]239ITR804(Cal, 1992]196ITR188(SC, 1985]152ITR308(SC, 81, 24, 181, 1A, one, ten, twenty, 113, 119, 130, 1982]137ITR879(Bom, 4, 4, 4, 1, 4, 2, 4, 4, 2, 2, 1, 2

DATE: 1979-80, 1980-81, 1961, Aug., 1977, 1979-80, 1961, 3,48,468 + Rs, a period of, two years, the year 1980-81.5, 1982, 1982, 1978, 1979, 1981, '26, years, 1998, 1999, 1997, 1997, 1995, 1995, 1990, 1990, the previous year, the assessment year, the first day, thirty-three years, the 1st day of April, 1948, thirty-three years', thirty-one years', 1922, 11 of 1922, 1978, 1979, 1981, 23rd Aug., 1977

GPE: Counsel, India, manner:(i, India, Clause, India, India, India, manner:(i, India, India, Expln, Expln, Counsel

ORDINAL: first, first, first, Second, second

MONEY: 6 per cent, six per cent, twenty per cent, 20 per cent, 20 per cent, 20 per cent

FAC: the Official Gazette

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //