Deep Hire Purchase P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Interest-tax (Appeals) - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Nov-17-2004

Court: Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Section 21, Section 260A, Section 4(2, Section 2(7, Section 194A

PERSON: N.K. Sud, I. T. A. Nos, Amritsar Bench, Amritsar, Jalandhar, Roor Singh, Pardeep Kumar, extent.10, P. C. Jain

CARDINAL: two, 194, 195, 4,75,745(ii, 2,282_________Total, 1981.4, 6, 91, 2,267(iii, 7,178, 2,267, 760, 229, 42, 4, 2,282, one, 8,94,859, only two

DATE: 2004, 1974, 1961, March 31, 2004, years 1992-93, the assessment year 1992-93, February 21, 1992, November 10, 1993, 1425, November 16, the assessment year 1993-94, December 23, 1993, March 31, 1995, 1966]2SCR828, November 16, 1981, March 6, 1992, year 1993-94, March 14, 1996, February 29, 1996, August 9, 1996, January 13, 1998, 1998, '11, the assessment years 1992-93, 1993-94, this position.14

ORG: Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Reliance, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Interest-tax Act, the Supreme Court, Sundaram Finance Ltd., State, Board, Kisan Vikas Patras, the Commissioner of Interest-tax (Appeals, Kisan Vikas Patra, ITR, Department, Revenue, Pardeep, the Tribunal, Board's Circular No

PRODUCT: Circular, Total 9,04,304___________8

GPE: Kerala