Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Sandeep Kumar Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Decided On : May-20-2003

Court : Punjab and Haryana

PERSON: S.S. Nijjar, Articles 226/227, Vocational, Sandeep Kumar, Tradesman, T.S. Dhindsa, Articles 14, Duty Soldier, Gurpreet Singh, Duty Soldier, Duty Soldier, Havaldar, Naib Subedar, Duty Soldier

CARDINAL: 1, one, 23.9.1996, 22.12.1999, 14.9.2000, 22.11.2000, 1.5.2000, 8, 4, 22.11.2000, 16, 15, one, 3.8.1997, 8, 6, 3.8.1997

GPE: India, India, Jat Regt, India, India

ORG: Army, the Sports Authority of India, National Sports Telants Contestants Scheme, National and International, Army, the Sports Authority of India, Army, Regimental Centres, Army, Centre Commandants of, Army Regimental Centres, Sports Authority of India, the Boys Sports Company, the Jat Regimental Centre, CBSE, Army, Army, Army, Army, Army, Junior National, Havaldars, the Armed Forces Sports College, Army, NDA, Army, Civil Writ Petition, Army, un-reasonable, Army, Army, Army, Army, Army, Junior National, Havaldars, the Armed Forces Sports College, International Sports, Subedar, NDA, Defence Personnel, the Defence Services, the Defence Services, Army, Army

DATE: the year 1976, 12 years, 3 months of age, 20.7.1993, 16 years of age, the end of two years, two years, 4.12.1999, 30.9.1996, May, 1997, approximately one year, a period of, two years, 30.9.1996

LOC: the Regimental Schools

ORDINAL: 10th, 10th

PERCENT: 15% to 20%

PRODUCT: P-10

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //