Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Bhim SaIn Nardosh Kumar and ors. Vs. Raj Pal

Decided On : Aug-07-1992

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Section 13, Section 14 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, Section 14 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, Section 13, Section 14 of the Act, Section 14 of the Act, Section 15(4, Section 115 of C. P. C. Section 15

PERSON: N.K. Kapoor, Raj Pal, Sadhu Ram, OPA(2, Raj Pal, Sher Singh, Sadhu Ram, ertswhile, i. e., i. e., again.12, Controller, Ex, i. e. 5-2-1987, Bhim Sain, Nardosh Kumar, Didar Singh, Rent C. R. 325, Piara Lal v. Kewal Krishan Chopra, A. I. R. 1988 S. C. 1432, Didar Singh, Controller

NORP: J.1

CARDINAL: 19-2-1990, 16-8-84, 5-3-1983, 1, 40/-, 22, two, 3, 3, one, 5, one, One, 21-11-1985--Ex, 5, two, 2, 3, 5-3-1983, 5, 21-11-1985, 21-11-1985, one, 2, one, one, 5

ORG: dismissed.2, Rent Controller, Expert, Bhim Sain, Rent Controller, Sadhu Ram, Expert, the Rent Controller Ex, Expert, Expert, x.

DATE: 16-8 1984, OPD(6, 4-8-1984, 1949, 1949, the year 1984, between November 1985 to February, 1987, 1989, 50/60 years old, the year 1981

ORDINAL: firstly, second, third, first

GPE: Des Raj, Des Raj, Des Raj, Des Raj, Des Raj, Des Raj

FAC: Kan war Sain v. Main Ram

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //