Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Jagdamba Dal and Oil Mills Vs. Income-tax Officer.
Decided On : Jun-02-1987
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur
LAW: the Firm Amendment Act, the IT Act, section 70, section 182, section 182, section 144, the IT Act
PERSON: Shri A. Kalyanasundharam, Ramchandra Cutpiece Store, C. B. D. T., Legislatures
DATE: up to assessment year 1973-74, the year, year 1971-72, year 1972-73, 70, 79-80, 1973, year, 1970, 1961, secs., year, the assessment year, the assessment year, less than fourteen days, no. 12, the subsequent years
CARDINAL: 12, 12, 184(7, 12, 184, 91, 184(7, 12, 184(7, 1-4, 2, 4, 12, 185, 15, 1-4-71, 12, 156, 27, 19-3-71, 1, One, 6, 12, 12, 182, 183, 182, 183, 184(7, 186(2).7, 182, 183, 184(7, 186(2, 182(1, 143, 144, 3, 1, 2, 3, 4, 184, 1, 2, 186, 2, 8, 183, 184,185, 186, 12, 186(2, 184(7, 139(4, 186
ORG: ITO, sec, Tribunal, Ram Chand 5, sec, Nand Singh Taneja &, Sons, CIT, Departmental Representative, sec, sec, u/s 139(1, ITO, Tribunal, Circular, Tribunal, Boards, 182 &, sec, ITO, sec, sec, ITO, sec, AAC, AAC
ORDINAL: second, second
GPE: Jaipur
FAC: the Jaipur Bench
MONEY: thirty per cent