Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Collector of Customs Vs. Electrotech
Decided On : Feb-15-1991
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
LAW: Section 2(f, Section 2(f, Section 2(f
CARDINAL: 1, 3, two, 1915/276, 3, 84.59(2).7, 30, two, 8, 13, 84.59, 2, 36, 367, 6, 6, 7, 8, 7, two, three, two, 8, 2, 84.59, 10
ORG: Collector of Customs, the Collector of Customs (Appeals, Registry, Collector (Appeals, JDR, Advocate, JDR, the Assistant Collector, the Customs Tariff, the Collector (Appeals, the Collector (Appeals, CTA, the Collector (Appeals, the Collector of Customs (Appeals, the Collector of Customs (Appeals, the Collector of Customs (Appeals, the Collector of Customs (Appeals, the Collector of Customs (Appeals, Central Excise Duty, CET, Tribunal, the Central Excises, Customs Tariff, National Small Industries v., Collector of Customs, ELT, Customs, Tribunal, the Customs Tariff Act, National Small Industries, the Customs Tariff, the Collector of Customs (Appeals, the Central Excises, The Collector Customs (Appeals, the Collector of Customs (Appeals, the Central Excises
GPE: Bombay, Bombay, Bombay
DATE: 3rd September, 1984, 2nd June, 1984, September, 1990, 9,10,11,12, 1944, 1988, 1975, 1944, 1944
PERSON: Shri M.K. Sohal, Shri Suman, J. Khaitan, Shri M.K. Sohal, Chemcut Model 547-15, Shri Sohal, Shri Sohal, Resco ADF-Stripper, Shri Sohal, Shri Sohal, Shri Sohal, Shri Suman, J. Khaitan, Nos, Resco ADF-Stripper
PERCENT: 40%, 51%, 49%
ORDINAL: 84.59(2