Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Joginder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and anr.
Decided On : Sep-14-1988
Court : Punjab and Haryana
LAW: Section 302, Section 3, Section 3 of the Act, Section 4, Section 3 or Section 4, Section 8, Section 9, Section 10, Section 10, Rule 3, Section 3, Section 4, Section 6, Article 19(2, Constitution, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4, Section 2, Section 8 of the Act, Section 8, Section 9, Constitution
PERSON: Chowdhri, Joginder Singh, Amritsar, Shri Dhanna Singh, Probation Officer, Swaran Singh, Swaran Singh, Behal Singh, Iqbal Singh, Swaran Singh, Sarup Singh, Behal Singh, Articles 14, Behal Singh, Iqbal Singh, Counsel, Julius, Bill, riot, Ramesh Thapper v. State, Cri LJ 1514, Law, Rakesh Kaushi v. B. L Vig, Krishna Iyer, Vide Francis Coralie Mullin v. Administrator of Union Territory, Articles 14, Francis Coralie Mullia, Swarn Singh, Behal Singh, Joginder Singh, Swaran Singh, Joginder Singh Petitioner, Behal Singh, Iqbal Singh, Swaran Singh, Behal Singh, Joginder Singh, Joginder Singh
NORP: J.1, Punjab, Rules
DATE: 3 years, 7 months, 12 days, 1 year, 6 months, 27 days, 1962, 18-11-1987, September, 1986, 14-9-1986, up to 2 years', 1963, 1985, 1985, 1880, 1957, 1950, 1966, 4 to 6 weeks, 3 weeks, the first year, 2 weeks, each successive year, less than 5 years, annual, 1952, a period of, 10 days, 10 days, up to 2 years', 1981, 21, 1986
LOC: the Superintendent Central Jail, the Superintendent of Jail, the Superintendent of Jail, the Superintendent of Jail, the Superintendent of Jail
ORG: the District Magistrate, The District Magistrate, the Inspector-General of Prisons, the State Government, the State Government, him.2, Inspector-General of Prisons, the District Magistrate, Station House, the Station House Officer, the Village Panchayat, the State of Punjab, the District Magistrate, Amritsar, State, Court, the State Government, the District Magistrate, the State Government, State, the State Government, the State Government, the District Magistrate, State, the Officer Incharge of, the Police Station, the Officer Incharge, the Inspector-General of Prisons, the Officer Incharge, Learned Counsel, State, the State Government, the District Magistrate, State of Himachal Pradesh, Cri LJ 1202, Court, Bishop, Oxford, AC 214, Authority, Kerala Education, AIR 1958, the State Government, State, Judicial Consideration, State, State, the State (, State, State, the State Government, Court, Delhi AIR 1981, SC, this High Court, Court, State, The Station House, The District Magistrate, District Magistrate
FAC: Police
QUANTITY: 9-2-1988
CARDINAL: four, four, 19 and, 21, two, 3, 2, 6, 2, 4.7, 2, 512, 5, 975, 594, 51, three, 1, 709, 746, 1966, 627, at least three, 3, 2, 2, 1981CriLJ1438, One, 21, four
GPE: District Magistrate, Kesar Singh v., Clause, Clauses, Central Jail, New Delhi, Singh
WORK_OF_ART: Security of State' and 'Public Order'
PRODUCT: Cri LJ 608, Lordship, Cri LJ 306, Articles 14