Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Shree Krishan Binani and Anr. Vs. Progressive Constructions Limited
Decided On : Aug-05-2015
Court : Kolkata
LAW: the Sales Tax Declaration Form, Section 42, the Sale of Goods Act, Section 94, the Code of Civil Procedure and Section 151 of the Code, Section 94, Section 94, Order 38, Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Order 38 Rule 5, Order 38, Rule 5, Section 151 of the Code, Rule 5, Order 38 Rule 5, Order 38, Rule 5 Code, Order 38, Rule 5, Order 38, Rule 5, Order 38, Rule 5 Code
CARDINAL: 2014, 527, 260, 38, 26, 27, 26, 27, 2008).SCC302, 6
DATE: 2014, August, 2015, January 2009, April 2011, January 2009 to April 2011, April 2011, 18th February, 2012, April, 2011, 26th March, 2012, 18, 29, January 2009, April 2011, April 2011, four weeks
ORG: CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, SHREE KRISHAN BINANI & ANR, Adv, Adv, Adv, Adv, Adv, Adv, Central Sales Tax Declaration Forms, National High Way Authority of India, NHAI, NHAI, Court, NHAI, Counsel, AIR1962 Supreme Court, CPC, Court, Court, Kohinoor Steel, Counsel, Fertiliser Corporation of India LTD.versus, Sunil Kakrania Versus Saltee Infrastructure, Division Bench, Court, Division Bench, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Supreme Court, Plaintiff, Court, Court, Court, NHAI, Registrar, SOUMEN SEN
ORDINAL: 5th
PERSON: Sumon Dutt, Kumar Gupta, Rajesh Kr, Gupta, Ramesh Dhara, Soumabho Ghose, Uttam Sharma, Rs.95,99,75/-, Sumon Dutt, Manohar Lal Chopra Versus Rai Bahadur Rao Raja Seth Hiralal, Soumabho Ghose, Chandra Kapoor, Ghose, Dutt, Ghose, Dutt, Raman Tech, Process Eng, Mundra, Md.Manech Gazil
GPE: Counsel, Sunil Kakrania, Sunil Kakrania
PRODUCT: Calcutta 97, Rs.25
PERCENT: 30%