Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Surender Paul Vs. Commisssioner of Income Tax

Decided On : May-26-2006

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, the IT Act, Section 132(4, Section 139(1, Section 139(1, Section 132 of the Act, Section 132(4, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, Section 132, the IT Act, Section 271(1)(c, the IT Act, Section 132(4, Section 139(1, Section 132(4, Section 271, Section 271, Section 271 of the Act, Section 132(4, Section 132 of the Act, Section 132, Section 132, Section 139

ORG: ORDER1, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, AO, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, CIT, the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, CIT

DATE: Aug., 2004, 1993-94, 1961, 1961, 1961, 30th Aug., 1993, the assessment year, Oct., 1993, 23rd May, 1994, 31st Jan., 2000, any previous year, such year, the year, 1984, Oct., 1984, any previous year, such year, any previous year, the assessment year, 23rd May, 1994, Oct., 1993.For

PERSON: Chandigarh, Bench, C. Whether, G. Whether, Authorised Representative

GPE: Expln, Expln, Expln, Expln, Expln, Expln, Expln, Expln, Counsel, Expln, Expln

CARDINAL: 5, 5, 5, 2, 3,00,000, 3,00,000, 5, 5, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 5, 2, 5, 5, 1, 4, 1, two

ORDINAL: 31st, 1st

LOC: Expln

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //