Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Surender Paul Vs. Commisssioner of Income Tax
Decided On : May-26-2006
Court : Punjab and Haryana
LAW: Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, the IT Act, Section 132(4, Section 139(1, Section 139(1, Section 132 of the Act, Section 132(4, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, Section 132, the IT Act, Section 271(1)(c, the IT Act, Section 132(4, Section 139(1, Section 132(4, Section 271, Section 271, Section 271 of the Act, Section 132(4, Section 132 of the Act, Section 132, Section 132, Section 139
ORG: ORDER1, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, AO, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, CIT, the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, CIT
DATE: Aug., 2004, 1993-94, 1961, 1961, 1961, 30th Aug., 1993, the assessment year, Oct., 1993, 23rd May, 1994, 31st Jan., 2000, any previous year, such year, the year, 1984, Oct., 1984, any previous year, such year, any previous year, the assessment year, 23rd May, 1994, Oct., 1993.For
PERSON: Chandigarh, Bench, C. Whether, G. Whether, Authorised Representative
GPE: Expln, Expln, Expln, Expln, Expln, Expln, Expln, Expln, Counsel, Expln, Expln
CARDINAL: 5, 5, 5, 2, 3,00,000, 3,00,000, 5, 5, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 5, 2, 5, 5, 1, 4, 1, two
ORDINAL: 31st, 1st
LOC: Expln