Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

State of Haryana Vs. Jagtar Singh

Decided On : May-15-1979

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: Section 15(1)(a)(i, Section 313, Section 10(7, Section 13 of the Act, Section 13(1, Section 16, Section 16, Rule 9, Section 13(2, Rule 9, Rule 9, Rule 9, Section 13, Rule 9, Section 13(2, Section 13(2).10, Rule 9, Rule 9, Pun LR 122, Rule 9, Section 13(2, Rule 9, Rule 9, Section 13(2, Rule 9, Section 13(2, Section 13(2, Rule 9, Section 13(2, Rule 9

PERSON: Harbans Lal, R.S. Agnihotri, Haryana, Chandigarh, Ram Ranjandal, P. W. 1, R.S. Agnihotri, P. W. 2, Wisakha Singh, D. W. 1.2, R.S. Agnihotri, K.K. Ramakrishna Pillai, Ghisa Ram, J. Murlidhar, Cri LJ 1634, prejudice.12, Mohan lal, Hanumandas Vaishnowa, Cri LJ 154, J., S. Sidhu

ORG: State, the Judicial Magistrate, Dabwali, the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, the Chief Medical Officer, Public, the Food Inspector, Food Inspector, Court, the 'Food Inspector, the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, the Chief Medical Officer, the Food Inspector, Public, State, Public, Public, Public, Public, Public, Public, the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, the Food Inspector, AnalystAddress, the Food Inspector, the Central Food Laboratory, the Central Food Laboratory, the.-Central Food Laboratory', Food Laboratory, the Central Government, Public, Public, the Food Inspector, the Supreme Court, Kassim Kunju Pookunju, Public, the Food Inspector, Court, the Food Inspector, Court, Court, Food, the Food Inspector, bee, the Food Inspector, Public, the Local Health Authority, the Local Health Authority, Court, the Local Health Authority, the Central Food Laboratory, Public, the Food Inspector ', Court, the Food Inspector, Public, the Local Health Authority, Public, Laboratory, the Food Inspector, the Local Health Authority, Municipal Corporation, the Central Food Laboratory, Court, Public, the Municipal Corporation, Court, Supreme, Punj & Har, LJ, Hyderabad, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, Public, Public, defence.14, K.S. Tiwana, the Central Government, the Food Inspector, the Local Health Authority, Public, Public, K.S. Tiwana, Nathi Ram's, Public, the Pood Inspector, Court, Court, the Food Inspector, the Local Health Authority, Public, Government, the Food Inspector, the Food Inspector, Court, the Food Inspector, Public, State, the Food Inspector, Public, State, Court, Court, Laboratory, the Food Inspector, the Local Health Authority, Public, Public, Court

DATE: October 31, 1977, August 21, 1975, Rule 18, Rule 17, Rule 18, 45 days, 1954, this...day, 18, 18, Section 13(5, Rules 17, 18, 1976, a period of, six months, working day, ten days, February 13, 1974, February 13, 1974, ten days, ten days, January 4, 1977, Rule 9, August 21, 1975, 1974, September 20, 1961, October 3, 1961, October 23, 1961, May 23, 1962, 1976, one month, about one year, 1968, six months, 1977, one day, ten days, 1978, May 29, 1973, July 13, 1973, about nine months, April 11, 1974, September 28, 1974, 1977, ten and a half months, 1978, to.16, Section 13(2, ten days, August 21, 1975, September 5, 1975, a few days, September 29, 1975, October 18,1975, about 24 days

CARDINAL: 660, 1.45, ten, three, three, 18, One, One, one, one, 18, two, 17, 18, 17, 18, 17, 18, two, two, One, 3, two, 3))Report, 19, 5, 272, 276, 3, 272, 276, 1860):Provided, 1A, 1, two, 17, two, 2, 1,000/-, 3, forty-five, two, two, 1, 2, 1967CriLJ939, 1, 183, 80

ORDINAL: third, second, second, second, eleventh, second, second, second, second, second

MONEY: 57 per cent, 45 per cent

GPE: Cr, Clause, Delhi, Nirmal, Singh v. State of Punjab, Bhola, future.17

NORP: Rules, Rules, Appendix, Rules, Rules, Maharashtra, R., Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules

PRODUCT: Rule 9-A, Chand LR (Cri, 916

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //